Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed 18 review petitions which were filed against the November 9 judgment in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid case.The bench held that the review petitions were lacking in merits. As regards the review sought by 40 activists, the bench held those who were not parties to the suit cannot be permitted to file review.The petitions were considered in the chamber by a five judges bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna (who came in place of former CJI Gogoi).
- Previous story Sures Mba Advt: Great order upholding the principles of law defined in 113B evidence act.THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.A.No.424 of 2012 section 498a
Recent Posts
- The trial Court has rightly rejected the application. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05.06.2025 ep Neutral citation : Yes/No To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch CID, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai -2. 2.The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Saidapet. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ep Crl.O.P.No.16399 of 2025 Crl.M.P.No.10273 of 2025 05.06.2025
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
- [18/06, 08:46] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Tksq1P994r0?si=mYqCIBA7Ji7EZQO7 [18/06, 09:50] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-jcBzeXVZem2z4LUkBBrzVJM9YE75lcs?si=9PS-SwfZnPNL_B5f
- On this sole ground of non-application of mind, the order impugned in this writ appeal is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the file of the respondent. Liberty is given to the respondent to issue fresh notice to the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant gives an undertaking that they would not plead the limitation as a defence. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the respondent will issue such a revised notice within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. We make it clear that all the contentions of both the parties are left open. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: State Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District – 628 902. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. ias W.A.(MD)No.1601 of 2021 16.04.2025
More
Recent Posts
- The trial Court has rightly rejected the application. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05.06.2025 ep Neutral citation : Yes/No To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch CID, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai -2. 2.The XI Metropolitan Magistrate Saidapet. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ep Crl.O.P.No.16399 of 2025 Crl.M.P.No.10273 of 2025 05.06.2025
- The title. Of the article “Beyond Blood and Marriage” Beyond Blood and Marriage: The Madras High Court and the Constitutional Recognition of Chosen Families By Srimathi Venkatachari In a quiet courtroom of the Madras High Court, a young woman’s freedom
- NOTIFICATION NO. 156 / 2025 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 18.06.2025 and pronounce Judgment in the cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE
- [18/06, 08:46] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Tksq1P994r0?si=mYqCIBA7Ji7EZQO7 [18/06, 09:50] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-jcBzeXVZem2z4LUkBBrzVJM9YE75lcs?si=9PS-SwfZnPNL_B5f
- On this sole ground of non-application of mind, the order impugned in this writ appeal is set aside and the writ appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the file of the respondent. Liberty is given to the respondent to issue fresh notice to the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant gives an undertaking that they would not plead the limitation as a defence. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that the respondent will issue such a revised notice within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. We make it clear that all the contentions of both the parties are left open. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (M.J.R. J.,) 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: State Tax Officer, Ettayapuram, Tuticorin District – 628 902. G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. ias W.A.(MD)No.1601 of 2021 16.04.2025
