Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed 18 review petitions which were filed against the November 9 judgment in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid case.The bench held that the review petitions were lacking in merits. As regards the review sought by 40 activists, the bench held those who were not parties to the suit cannot be permitted to file review.The petitions were considered in the chamber by a five judges bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna (who came in place of former CJI Gogoi).
- Previous story Sures Mba Advt: Great order upholding the principles of law defined in 113B evidence act.THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.A.No.424 of 2012 section 498a
Recent Posts
- Today mhc judges advts cricket match player detail s
- [1/24, 18:53] sekarreporter1: [1/24, 18:24] Bar Council vice chairman Karthigayan: The Bar Council Chairman Mr.P.S.AMALRAJ,Vice Chairman Mr.V.Karthikeyan ,BCI Mr.S.Prabakaran ,Senior Advocate,and Mr.G.Mhoganakrishnan all are special Welcome to Mr.P.Wilson,Senior Advocate,and Mr.ARL SUNDARESAN,Senior Advocate, Also Today 24/01/2020 Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996 Books issued For District Judge Exams(Preliminary)all Students. @ Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry. [1/24, 18:33] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [1/24, 19:36] sekarreporter1: On behalf of our TN Senior Advocates forum, I thank Mr *ARL Sundaresan * Senior Advocate who delivered lecture today (24.1.2020) between 4.30-6.30pm at Barcouncil Auditorium , Chennai on *The Arbitrationand concillation Act* Many thanks to him💐 P. Wilson Senior Advocate Convenor *NEETHI KARANGAL*
- Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Rajini case Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍
- For state of Tamil Nadu State Government Pleader V.Jayaprakash Narayanan argued. Sankara subbu argued, at the time of arrest one accused shot dead and thereafter 3 more accused were shot dead by police. State GP argued that the review committee spent five different dates for hearing from various senior counsels including Sankara subbu on behalf of accused persons and taken a decision and after satisfaction of prima facie case made out under POTA Act permitted to continue the trial. Further the decision was taken after perusal of all materials collected by investigation officer found the case is fit for continuation of trial under POTA Act. GP further told the court that the terrorists only invited such situation which nececitates the police to take extreme step of firing on them. Heated arguments by both sides. Sankara subbu sought further time for continuation of arguments posted on 3/2/2020
More
Recent Posts
- Today mhc judges advts cricket match player detail s
- [1/24, 18:53] sekarreporter1: [1/24, 18:24] Bar Council vice chairman Karthigayan: The Bar Council Chairman Mr.P.S.AMALRAJ,Vice Chairman Mr.V.Karthikeyan ,BCI Mr.S.Prabakaran ,Senior Advocate,and Mr.G.Mhoganakrishnan all are special Welcome to Mr.P.Wilson,Senior Advocate,and Mr.ARL SUNDARESAN,Senior Advocate, Also Today 24/01/2020 Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996 Books issued For District Judge Exams(Preliminary)all Students. @ Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry. [1/24, 18:33] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [1/24, 19:36] sekarreporter1: On behalf of our TN Senior Advocates forum, I thank Mr *ARL Sundaresan * Senior Advocate who delivered lecture today (24.1.2020) between 4.30-6.30pm at Barcouncil Auditorium , Chennai on *The Arbitrationand concillation Act* Many thanks to him💐 P. Wilson Senior Advocate Convenor *NEETHI KARANGAL*
- Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Rajini case Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍
- For state of Tamil Nadu State Government Pleader V.Jayaprakash Narayanan argued. Sankara subbu argued, at the time of arrest one accused shot dead and thereafter 3 more accused were shot dead by police. State GP argued that the review committee spent five different dates for hearing from various senior counsels including Sankara subbu on behalf of accused persons and taken a decision and after satisfaction of prima facie case made out under POTA Act permitted to continue the trial. Further the decision was taken after perusal of all materials collected by investigation officer found the case is fit for continuation of trial under POTA Act. GP further told the court that the terrorists only invited such situation which nececitates the police to take extreme step of firing on them. Heated arguments by both sides. Sankara subbu sought further time for continuation of arguments posted on 3/2/2020
CALL ME