![[3/10, 20:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1237391468299337730?s=08 [3/10, 20:25] Sekarreporter 1: Full bench today hearing from morning 12 o clock to evening 5 o clock ag Vijayanarayanan air argued full day esi educational insitutueக்கு வரும் என்று வாதாடினார. வழக்கு coming Friday adj](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed 18 review petitions which were filed against the November 9 judgment in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid case.The bench held that the review petitions were lacking in merits. As regards the review sought by 40 activists, the bench held those who were not parties to the suit cannot be permitted to file review.The petitions were considered in the chamber by a five judges bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna (who came in place of former CJI Gogoi).
- Previous story Sures Mba Advt: Great order upholding the principles of law defined in 113B evidence act.THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.A.No.424 of 2012 section 498a
Recent Posts
- Madras HC upholds Constitutionality of S. 13 of Family Courts Act;
- மணிப்பூர் நிதி ஒதுக்கீட்டு மசோதா மீது கழக மாநிலங்களவை உறுப்பினர் திரு.பி.வில்சன் எம்.பி அவர்களது உரை.
- Justice K Murali Shankar in his order said the court has no hesitation to hold that permitting the prosecution to continue would be an “abuse of process of court”.
- Temple land MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.No.9297 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10437 and 10438 of 2025 P.Bhaskar .. Petitioner vs 1.The Principal Secretary,
- MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A.No.3582 of 2024 and C.M.P.Nos.27835 & 27838 of 2024
More
Recent Posts
- Madras HC upholds Constitutionality of S. 13 of Family Courts Act;
- மணிப்பூர் நிதி ஒதுக்கீட்டு மசோதா மீது கழக மாநிலங்களவை உறுப்பினர் திரு.பி.வில்சன் எம்.பி அவர்களது உரை.
- Justice K Murali Shankar in his order said the court has no hesitation to hold that permitting the prosecution to continue would be an “abuse of process of court”.
- Temple land MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.No.9297 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.10437 and 10438 of 2025 P.Bhaskar .. Petitioner vs 1.The Principal Secretary,
- MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A.No.3582 of 2024 and C.M.P.Nos.27835 & 27838 of 2024
