. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The decision to count delivery of twins as to come within two child norm is erroneous.I have considered a similar issue ten years ago and ruled that it is one delivery and for the subsequent delivery the woman employee is entitled for all benefits including maternity leave.The rules cannot be looked in to population control norms but from the women’s health point of view

[3/3, 07:12] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 07:08] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 07:08] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234654015067246592?s=08
[3/3, 07:08] Sekarreporter 1: https://t.co/nS9CToSmCX woman giving birth to child after twins in 1st delivery not entitled to maternity benefits: Madras HC https://t.co/oeGe4ABQhE
[3/3, 07:10] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC counts twins as 2 deliveries – http://toi.in/N-nFJb/a31gj

Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now:
https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare
[3/3, 09:57] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 07:41] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The decision to count delivery of twins as to come within two child norm is erroneous.I have considered a similar issue ten years ago and ruled that it is one delivery and for the subsequent delivery the woman employee is entitled for all benefits including maternity leave.The rules cannot be looked in to population control norms but from the women’s health point of view.There is no law prescribing two child norm.The leave rules are framed only to limit the liability of the state to meet the expenses.In which case a woman is entitiled to get leave for two deliveries & not getting for two children even if it is one delivery.It is discriminatory because the other women will get two sets of leave for two separate deliveries.The DB has made a mechanical interpretation and opposed to article 42 of the constitution!!!
[3/3, 09:56] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 10:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234697968223244288?s=08
[3/3, 10:05] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 10:02] Pattabi Mhc Advt: Excellent count from former judge of Madras High court justice k.chandru some information has to be reviewed by the same division bench short while from now suo Moto power very well with in the jurisdiction courtesy advocate s.pattabiraman
[3/3, 10:05] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 10:07] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 09:57] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 07:41] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: The decision to count delivery of twins as to come within two child norm is erroneous.I have considered a similar issue ten years ago and ruled that it is one delivery and for the subsequent delivery the woman employee is entitled for all benefits including maternity leave.The rules cannot be looked in to population control norms but from the women’s health point of view.There is no law prescribing two child norm.The leave rules are framed only to limit the liability of the state to meet the expenses.In which case a woman is entitiled to get leave for two deliveries & not getting for two children even if it is one delivery.It is discriminatory because the other women will get two sets of leave for two separate deliveries.The DB has made a mechanical interpretation and opposed to article 42 of the constitution!!!
[3/3, 09:56] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 09:58] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: 👍
[3/3, 10:08] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 10:00] Mhc Advt Maharaja Advt: The above said judgment reported any journal lordship
[3/3, 10:07] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁
[3/3, 11:28] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 11:28] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234719490165788677?s=08
[3/3, 11:28] Sekarreporter 1: As per Central civil service leave rules rules a women employee is entitled to maternity benefit if she has less than two living children. Argued by k.Srinivasa murthy , spc for uoi https://t.co/T11VpiXhCO
[3/3, 13:05] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 13:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234743364563550208?s=08
[3/3, 13:05] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 12:56] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: See my judgement on women having delivery first time twins second time one child.i have held that she is not disqualified from receiving maternity benefits.Todays DB order has taken the opposite view.I don’t know whether my decision was cited or not.
[3/3, 13:00] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 12:56] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: See my judgement on women having delivery first time twins second time one child.i have held that she is not disqualified from receiving maternity benefits.Todays DB order has taken the opposite view.I don’t know whether my decision was cited or not.
[3/3, 12:59] Sekarreporter 1: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)NO.13555 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)NO.1 OF 2009 J.Sharmila .. Petitioner vs27.In the present case, it is suffice to state that if the intention of the State Government is to afford protection of the woman for her second delivery, then it should not be based upon the number of children she delivers during those two deliveries. The importance has to be seen only from the health point of the woman Government servant and not the number of children one delivers during each delivery. Hence this court is not inclined to accept the reasons found in the impugned order based upon the so-called Explanation 1 to Rule 101(a) of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner who had availed maternity leave for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.1.2007 during her second pregnancy, is entitled to be paid full salary for that period. 28.In the light of the above, the writ petition will stand allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. The respondents are directed to pay full salary to the petitioner for the maternity leave availed by her for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.01.2007 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed https://www.sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-k-chandru-w-p-mdno-13555-of-2009-and-m-p-mdno-1-of-2009-j-sharmila-petitioner-vs27-in-the-present-case-it-is-suffice-to-state-that-if/
[3/3, 13:39] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 13:24] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Only non labour lawyer can give this interpretation Mr murthy the FR is identical for both.please read the order before giving erudite opinion.constitution of India is tha same for all.
[3/3, 13:38] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁
[3/3, 13:39] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 13:39] Thirumaran Sgp Mhc: Justice Chandru’s order is correct one
Suppose if in the first delivery, she gets three child is it a bar
[3/3, 13:39] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁
[3/3, 13:43] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 13:42] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Pandavars mother kunti will be disqualified under the DB order!
[3/3, 13:42] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 13:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 13:42] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Pandavars mother kunti will be disqualified under the DB order!
[3/3, 13:42] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 14:03] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 14:02] Kannan Nrc Junipr: Mr. K.Chandru has at last attained enlightenment of the fact that Mahabharata is not a myth but reality😁😁😁
[3/3, 14:03] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 14:05] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 14:04] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, justice chandru, my Lord ,துரியோதனன் mother காந்தாரி, delivered 100 ,may be eligible, more than pandavars.
[3/3, 14:05] Sekarreporter 1:
[3/3, 14:06] Sekarreporter 1: [3/3, 14:04] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar, justice chandru, my Lord ,துரியோதனன் mother காந்தாரி, delivered 100 ,may be eligible, more than pandavars.
[3/3, 14:05] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME