SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 31, 2026

Judge Arul murugan#cruelty or harassment meted out to the deceased by the accused thereafter in 6 months prior to the date of occurrence. In the absence of any such evidence, the charge for offences under Sections 498A and 304B of IPC and Section 4 of the Act are not proved.

2026:MHC:1273 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 24.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON :  30.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Crl.A.No.284 of 2022 Das @ Pragalathan, S/o.Danusu, Gangaiamman Kovil Street, Kalaiyur Village,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 31, 2026

Justice G. Arul Murugan observed: “… Unless it is established that the deceased was subjected to cruelty in connection with the demand of dowry soon before death, the presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act cannot be raised and the offence under Section 304B IPC will not get attracted. Further

Home  / Court Updates  / High Courts  / Madras High Court Dowry Death Presumption Cannot Be Invoked Without Proof Of Cruelty Soon Before Death: Madras High Court Sets Aside Conviction The High Court held...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
11.Insofar as the transfer of officials is concerned, it is within the domain of the Election Commission to take appropriate decisions in accordance with law. 12.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.   [N.S.K.,J.]       [M.J.R.,J.]

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 31, 2026

11.Insofar as the transfer of officials is concerned, it is within the domain of the Election Commission to take appropriate decisions in accordance with law. 12.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.   [N.S.K.,J.]       [M.J.R.,J.]

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P(MD)No.8029 of 2026 C.Selvakumar, S/o.P.Chinnaiah, President, Madurai District Devendrakula Velalar Uravinar Sangam,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Madras High Court is reviewing a case related to the Palani Temple, where a petition has been filed challenging certain expenditures from temple funds. The court has expressed its view that

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 31, 2026

The Madras High Court is reviewing a case related to the Palani Temple, where a petition has been filed challenging certain expenditures from temple funds. The court has expressed its view that

[31/03, 12:09] sekarreporter1: “Mr.A.K.Sriram (R3) Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Bharaneedharan Mr.R.Murali Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the” Palani temple 10.We are of the view that, before incurring such huge expenditure from temple...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[31/03, 11:35] sekarreporter1: West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging transfer of IAS-IPS officers ordered by ECI Read here: barandbench.com/news/west-beng… [31/03, 11:35] Meta AI: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to transfer several IAS and IPS officers in West Bengal ahead of the Assembly elections. The transfers, which included the chief secretary, home secretary, and DGP, were made immediately after the election schedule was announced. ¹ The petitioner, Arka Kumar Nag, had argued that the large-scale transfers would disrupt the state’s administration and were politically motivated. However, the ECI defended its actions, stating that it has the authority to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections. ² The court, led by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, upheld the ECI’s decision, emphasizing its powers in managing state officials during elections. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the Election Commission’s powers in India? [31/03, 11:35] Meta AI: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to transfer several IAS and IPS officers in West Bengal ahead of the Assembly elections. The transfers, which included the chief secretary, home secretary, and DGP, were made immediately after the election schedule was announced. ¹ The petitioner, Arka Kumar Nag, had argued that the large-scale transfers would disrupt the state’s administration and were politically motivated. However, the ECI defended its actions, stating that it has the authority to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections. ² The court, led by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, upheld the ECI’s decision, emphasizing its powers in managing state officials during elections. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the Election Commission’s powers in India?

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 31, 2026

[31/03, 11:35] sekarreporter1: West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging transfer of IAS-IPS officers ordered by ECI Read here: barandbench.com/news/west-beng… [31/03, 11:35] Meta AI: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to transfer several IAS and IPS officers in West Bengal ahead of the Assembly elections. The transfers, which included the chief secretary, home secretary, and DGP, were made immediately after the election schedule was announced. ¹ The petitioner, Arka Kumar Nag, had argued that the large-scale transfers would disrupt the state’s administration and were politically motivated. However, the ECI defended its actions, stating that it has the authority to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections. ² The court, led by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, upheld the ECI’s decision, emphasizing its powers in managing state officials during elections. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the Election Commission’s powers in India? [31/03, 11:35] Meta AI: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to transfer several IAS and IPS officers in West Bengal ahead of the Assembly elections. The transfers, which included the chief secretary, home secretary, and DGP, were made immediately after the election schedule was announced. ¹ The petitioner, Arka Kumar Nag, had argued that the large-scale transfers would disrupt the state’s administration and were politically motivated. However, the ECI defended its actions, stating that it has the authority to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections. ² The court, led by Chief Justice Sujoy Paul, upheld the ECI’s decision, emphasizing its powers in managing state officials during elections. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the Election Commission’s powers in India?

[31/03, 11:35] sekarreporter1: West Bengal elections: Calcutta HC dismisses PIL challenging transfer of IAS-IPS officers ordered by ECI Read here: barandbench.com/news/west-beng… [31/03, 11:35] Meta AI: The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version