CAA discussion

[12/29, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 18:03] Jeganathan Advt: Can Advocate Surya Prakash tell why he’s opposed to CAA and NRC and also against which provisions he is against in the new Amendment
[12/29, 18:05] Jeganathan Advt: I would love to know please 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 19:15] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:09] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: You really want to know patty!read yesterday’s centrre page article by Chief justice APShah.you will know.i will just now send you.shed your prejudice &read the scholarly article!
[12/29, 19:15] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 19:57] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:41] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: உள்ளங்கை புண்ணுக்கு கண்ணாடி வேண்டாம்!
[12/29, 19:56] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 20:04] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 19:59] Patty Jeganathan Mhc Advt: Sekar now I understood justice chandru from village. He knows opt proverbs.😁😁
[12/29, 20:04] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/29, 20:16] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:08] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: a INA freedom fighter pension writ appeal filed by the central government against the single judge orderfreedom fighter widow Mrs. Lakshmi directing the government to sanction her came up before the first bench consisting of justice A.P.Shaw and justice Ibrahim kalifulla and the union government argued that the said Lakshmi who is a Tamilian and came to Chennai as repatriate and settled in Chennai wasborn in Burma and as such she cannot be considered as Indian citizen but the bench dismissed the writ appeal of the government and held that Lakshmi father was a citizen of crown ( then British empire) and as such children born to crown citizens are deemed to be Indian citizens and further directed the government to sanction her NIA pension immediately
[12/29, 20:10] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Subsequently central government accepted that position and granted her family pension. I have appeared for Mrs. Lakshmi in that case
[12/29, 20:41] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:16] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:08] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: a INA freedom fighter pension writ appeal filed by the central government against the single judge orderfreedom fighter widow Mrs. Lakshmi directing the government to sanction her came up before the first bench consisting of justice A.P.Shaw and justice Ibrahim kalifulla and the union government argued that the said Lakshmi who is a Tamilian and came to Chennai as repatriate and settled in Chennai wasborn in Burma and as such she cannot be considered as Indian citizen but the bench dismissed the writ appeal of the government and held that Lakshmi father was a citizen of crown ( then British empire) and as such children born to crown citizens are deemed to be Indian citizens and further directed the government to sanction her NIA pension immediately
[12/29, 20:10] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Subsequently central government accepted that position and granted her family pension. I have appeared for Mrs. Lakshmi in that case
[12/29, 20:16] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Union of India vs S.M .S. Lakshmi
[12/29, 20:41] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 20:16] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Union of India vs S.M .S. Lakshmi
[12/29, 20:18] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: freedom fighter pension to Lakshmi
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: [12/29, 21:12] Jeganathan Advt: Under the New Amendment there is not a Single Word called Islam, Muslim etc…
how do you say it’s against Indian Muslims and Indian Muslims will lose citizenship please explain based on What provisions of the new CAA kindly enlighten sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻
[12/29, 21:18] Sekarreporter 1: 👍