![[5/24, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1264437989804929024?s=08 [5/24, 11:38] Sekarreporter 1: HC directs tobacco case accused to pay ₹2 lakh to Cancer Institute–According to Additional Public Prosecutor S. Karthikeyan, the police had raided a shed in a garden owned by the petitioner’s business associate Vinay Reddy at Bellagondapalli village on April 28 and seized 8.4 lakh sachets of chewing tobacco. https://www.sekarreporter.com/hc-directs-tobacco-case-accused-to-pay-%e2%82%b92-lakh-to-cancer-institute-according-to-additional-public-prosecutor-s-karthikeyan-the-police-had-raided-a-shed-in-a-garden-owned-by-the-petitioner/](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Breaking: Allahabad HC takes suo motu cognizance on news reports alleging that situation in the State of Uttar Pradesh is antithetical to core constitutional values
- Previous story SIT must investigate corruption allegations against Velumani
Recent Posts
- bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N Bhatti, two special leave petitions challenging the order was heard. Appearing for the State, Senior Advocate Amit Anand Tiwari argued that the State police had filed a chargesheet, contrary to what was argued before the High Court that no chargesheet
- MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI W.P. Nos.5972, 5974, 5976, 5979, 6466, 6469, 6470, 6483, 6484, 7442 7448, 7449 and 7451 of 2025 &
- Madras HC sets-aside order passed by the Revenue as ex-parte in light of proceedings being carried out through the common portal; Observing that the notices including reminder notices were uploaded only through the common portal under the tab “View Additional Notices/Orders”, holds that “….when the respondent-Department realizes the fact that the notice effected via, On-line
- Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W. P.No.5539 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.6103 & 6104 of 2025 Tvl. Sri Balaji Traders
- SC orders probe into TN caste certificates The SC said that “once the report comes, we shall thereafter proceed to look into each of the petitions independently.”
More
Recent Posts
- bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and S.V.N Bhatti, two special leave petitions challenging the order was heard. Appearing for the State, Senior Advocate Amit Anand Tiwari argued that the State police had filed a chargesheet, contrary to what was argued before the High Court that no chargesheet
- MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI W.P. Nos.5972, 5974, 5976, 5979, 6466, 6469, 6470, 6483, 6484, 7442 7448, 7449 and 7451 of 2025 &
- Madras HC sets-aside order passed by the Revenue as ex-parte in light of proceedings being carried out through the common portal; Observing that the notices including reminder notices were uploaded only through the common portal under the tab “View Additional Notices/Orders”, holds that “….when the respondent-Department realizes the fact that the notice effected via, On-line
- Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W. P.No.5539 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.6103 & 6104 of 2025 Tvl. Sri Balaji Traders
- SC orders probe into TN caste certificates The SC said that “once the report comes, we shall thereafter proceed to look into each of the petitions independently.”
