You may also like...
-
Sekarreporter1: This judgement the court has held that an order need not be set aside if setting aside such order would revive an illegal order [3/11, 09:23] Sekarreporter1: W.P.No.13597 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10.02.2021 Coram The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.No.13597 of 2020. —govt Mr.K.Kumaresh Babu for R2 Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.E.Balamurugan Special Government Pleader Mr.Prabhu for R2 Standing Counsel
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 11, 2021
-
lashminarayanan Advt Mhc: As for Mr. Datar ‘s view that in regard to UK and USA. Let me beg to disagree. The executive doesn’t meet the judiciary is a misnomer. How come those who speak about this don’t object to the CJ’s and PM’s meet year on year. Let us not forget for over 500 years , the lord chancellor (head of the judiciary in the UK) was a part of the cabinet.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 18, 2020
-
The judge directed Additional Government Pleader R. Vijayakumar to obtain instructions as to how the government on one hand expected all private establishments to pay salaries during this period and on the other, banned private schools from collecting fees. The question was posed during the hearing of a writ petition filed by All India Private Educational Institutions’ Association.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 24, 2020
I was just telling my friend about that.
Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you! However, how can we communicate?|