April 9 th sekarreporter WhatsApp news only court news
[4/8, 16:59] Sekarreporter 1: Tks
[4/8, 17:05] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 17:04] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1247850249541963777?s=08
[4/8, 17:04] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 16:55] Sugendren: தங்களின் Watsup பதிவுகள் எங்களை தினம் தினம் நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு சென்று வரும் உணர்வை வருகின்றது. சேகர் சார் மிக்க நன்றி 🙏…
[4/8, 16:59] Sekarreporter 1: Tks
[4/8, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1247853239099199488?s=08
[4/8, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC makes a fervent appeal to friends and relatives of all COVID-19 positive patients, and also the relatives of foreign returnees, in TN to get quarantined voluntarily than being forced to do so. @THChennai
[4/8, 17:23] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1247853239099199488?s=08
[4/8, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC makes a fervent appeal to friends and relatives of all COVID-19 positive patients, and also the relatives of foreign returnees, in TN to get quarantined voluntarily than being forced to do so. @THChennai
[4/8, 18:41] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar through video conference yesterday. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent. After hearing both side arguments, Honble Justice granted interim bail to the petitioner with the condition that the petitioner should remain inside the house for the next 15 days.
[4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar yesterday. The honble justice heard both counsel arguments through video conference. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent and stated that the petitioner is habitual offender and he has involved six cases. The Honble justice dismissed the Bail Petition.
[4/8, 18:41] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:39] Sekarreporter 1: Crl.O.P.No.7203 of 2020
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.04.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.7203 of 2020
Akash M/A 21
S/o Anbalagan .. Petitioner
.Vs.
State Rep.by:
The Inspector of Police,
Tiruvallur Town Police Station
Tiruvallur District
[Cr.No.178 of 2020] .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., to enlarge the
Petitioner/Accused on bail in Cr.No.178 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent
police.
For Petitioner : Mr. Anish
For Respondent : Mr.C. Iyyappa Raj
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The Petitioner, who has been arrested under Section 147, 148, 341, 294 ( b )
Page 1 / 4
[4/8, 18:39] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar through video conference yesterday. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent. After hearing both side arguments, Honble Justice granted interim bail to the petitioner with the condition that the petitioner should remain inside the house for the next 15 days.
[4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar yesterday. The honble justice heard both counsel arguments through video conference. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent and stated that the petitioner is habitual offender and he has involved six cases. The Honble justice dismissed the Bail Petition.
[4/8, 18:46] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1247875425579065350?s=08
[4/8, 18:45] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar through video conference yesterday. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent. After hearing both side arguments, Honble Justice granted interim bail to the petitioner with the condition that the petitioner should remain inside the house for the next 15 days.
[4/8, 18:38] Sekarreporter 1: Emergency Bail petition filed by the petitioner came up before Honble Justice Sathish Kumar yesterday. The honble justice heard both counsel arguments through video conference. APP Iyyaparaj appeared for the respondent and stated that the petitioner is habitual offender and he has involved six cases. The Honble justice dismissed the Bail Petition.
[4/8, 18:46] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1247875571377303553?s=08
[4/8, 18:48] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 18:10] Chellapandian Mhc Advt: The statement of the State government before NKKJ bench, stating that all facilities have been made for farmers in transportation, is how far true, Iam leaving it to the state government, Farmers are always suffering like a fish in the Hot sand.No Transportation No Procurement, May be within 10% that too at the instance of farmers is a fact. FARMERS are always sufferers is a fact🙏
[4/8, 18:47] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏼
[4/8, 21:54] Sekarreporter 1: [4/8, 21:53] Sekarreporter 1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2020/04/08/watch%e0%ae%a8%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%81%e0%ae%b7%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a3%e0%ae%a9%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%81/
[4/8, 21:53] Sekarreporter 1: Sooooper
[4/9, 07:28] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 07:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: Lordship 4th letter super congrats sir
SCIENCE LEAPS: LAW STAYS PUT
This article is an attempt to explore how the burgeoning sophistication of Artificial Intelligence (A.I) and Robots and their widespread deployment everywhere, from homes and hospitals to public spaces and the battlefield, necessitates a rethink of a wide variety of philosophical and public policy issues, and their uneasy interaction with the existing legal regimes thereby impelling a revamp of our existing law and policies. This situation is analogous to how policymakers and lawmakers had to approach and tackle issues of the Internet when it virtually took over the whole world in the 1990’s.
For the purpose of this article, a robot must be understood as a constructed system that displays both physical and mental agency but is not alive in the biological sense. The most common robot in the world at present is the I-Robot Roomba. This is a small robot that is capable of autonomously vacuum-cleaning your house. They are fully autonomous in the sense that they need no human assistance. They make rational decisions as they scoot around the floor. In the military, ground-based robots such as the Packbot (IRobot) and the Talon (Foster Middler) are becoming ubiquitous. These systems could be used to replace human soldiers in highly risky operations such as disabling explosives, attack on buildings, counter-insurgency operations etc. Autonomous warehouse robots have been put into operation, which appear to have their own mental agency as they avoid colliding against each other and reconfigure storage locations of items in the warehouse based on customer demand. Google has a fleet of self-driven cars, the prototypes of which have already hit the roads in the Unites States of America. Robots used as therapeutic aides are available and they are being used to assist individuals with severe motor disabilities in their homes. These are mere illustrations. More and more robots will eventually enter our daily lives in the coming decade. This surge in the emergence of robots into the functioning of our day-to-day lives is bound to result in a plethora of legislative challenges. As robots operating with sophisticated AI become more and more multipurpose, it will be trickier to imagine, a priori, as to how and where they may be used. In the extreme case (hopefully in the future) of a robot which is fully capable of performing everything that a human being can- there are few practical boundaries on what the robot cannot do. How does one legislate to legally reign in such a system? As robots become more autonomous, the question of where the liability rests when something goes wrong will assume relevance. This is an issue labyrinthine in its nature. Is it the manufacturer or the programmer or the user (who might have given an inappropriate or misleading instruction) severally, or a combination of all three jointly? The sheer variety of applications and tasks that robots can execute will, thus, lay enormous pressure on the existing legal system in a wide range of substantive areas including tort, contract, consumer protection, privacy and penal law among others. The internet, which emerged just 30 years back has virtually glued every other human being into cyber space and it has and continues to throw up new challenges for law enforcement. Humans never did imagine that development would happen at this startling pace. By the time a new law or an enforcement mechanism is brought into effect, there is further development, which makes it a struggle to keep pace with the challenges posed by cyber space. Therefore, it is crucial that we do not remain in a fool’s paradise thinking that robots will not get more autonomous and get into the real world, which up until now was in the domain of human beings. Given the benefits that robots might someday confer on humanity, should we, or can we, remain in control once they emerge superior to us in respect of certain abilities? ‘Jeopardy’ is a classic game show with a twist. The answers are given first and the contestants supply the questions. The two all-time champions of this show Ken Jennings and Brad Rutler were pitted against IBM’s Robot Watson. Watson is a deep question-answering super computer. It won hands down. With this IBM system, human monopoly over natural language was obliterated, rendering Watson the world’s go-to expert at Jeopardy. Watson’s success raises questions as to the role that humans would occupy once robots can perform a multitude of tasks traditionally delegated to human experts- and not just performing them but performing them more efficiently and effectively than humans. Today, scientists can come up with algorithms which enable AI to understand facial expressions and act accordingly. What happens if a driverless car, which is claimed to be safer than a human driven car, causes an accident and kills or grievously hurts someone? What happens if an autonomous robot misreads a facial expression and attacks a human being and causes death or injury? What happens if a malfunctioning AI mishandles a patient suffering from some disability while assisting him/her during a treatment? What happens if robots are programmed to carry out terrorist activities in a building or locality? Who should be made liable? These are looming and persistent questions for which there exists no satisfactory answers. There are other facets to this. Sex-Bots are being created using a combination of existing AI technology, sensory perception capabilities, synthetic physiological responses and affective computing. Proponents of sex-bots predict that these robots will facilitate sexual interaction and provide companionship for human users. The idea of fabrication of a woman for a man’s purpose can be traced back to pre-biblical myths. This historically regressive and oppressive belief that women are created to serve men is brought to life in the designing and programming of female-like robots. Anthromorphised robots that can interact with humans and learn from their own environment have already started hitting the market. Aiko is a female robot built out of silicone, which has a similar appearance and texture to the human skin. Actroid F technology now has taken it further and improved facial movements that allow it to detect and initiate human expressions. Sex-Bots are physical and interactive manifestations of a woman that are programmed into submission. These sex-bots do not have the capacity to decline, criticize or become dissatisfied with the user, unless they are programmed to do so. Documentaries like “The Mechanical Bride”, “My Sex-Robot” reflect the deleterious effects of this invention on the attitude of men towards women. The use of sex-bots and the potential creation of an industry that commoditizes the circumvention of female consent may de-value female personhood, encourage misogynistic reactions upon women and impair values about the role of women in society. Sex-Bots that appear stereotypically like a female and act as sexual slaves to their owners send a very damaging message about womanhood. Consent strengthens personal autonomy which is an integral facet of the right to life. It is an essential element of contract law, medical treatment and sexual interaction. Preserving human autonomy by ensuring the presence of consent is especially important in situations where lack of consent could negatively affect an individual’s physical and psychological integrity. How are we going to deal with this dangerous situation in the near future? When it comes to the liability and the question as to who is to be held liable for the acts of AI and Robots, there are several if’s and buts. The legal liability of AI systems depends on at least three factors:Whether AI is a product or a service? This is ill-defined in law; different commentators offer different views.
If a criminal offence is being considered, what is the mens rea required? It seems unlikely that AI programs will contravene laws that require knowledge that a criminal act was being committed; but it is highly possible they might contravene laws for which ‘a reasonable man would have known’ that a course of action could lead to an offence, and it is almost certain that they could contravene strict liability offences.
Whether the limitations of AI systems are communicated to a purchaser? Since AI systems have both general and specific limitations, legal cases on such issues may well be based on the specific wording of any warnings about such limitations.
There is also the question of who should be held liable. It will depend on which of the following models will apply (perpetrator-by-another; natural-probable- consequence; or direct liability):
• In a perpetrator-by-another offence, the person who instructs the AI system – either the user or the programmer – is likely to be found liable.
• In a natural-or-probable-consequence offence, liability could fall on anyone who might have reasonably foreseen the product being used in the way it was; the programmer, the vendor (of a product), or the service provider. The user is less likely to be blamed unless the instructions that came with the product/service spell out the limitations of the system and the possible consequences of misuse in unusual detail.
• AI programs may also be held liable for strict liability offences, in which case the programmer is likely to be found at fault.
However, in all cases where the programmer is deemed liable, there may be further debates: whether the fault lies with the programmer; the program designer; the expert who provided the knowledge; or the manager who appointed the inept expert, program designer or programmer?
Am I over-reacting to the situation? I believe I am not. Western countries which are the major contributors to this development are working at a feverish pace to simultaneously develop laws to ensure that legal liability is properly fixed in cases of adverse impacts caused by AI/Robots. A lot of study is going on and experts are churning out a lot of research to set down normative standards for an effective enforcement mechanism to fix liability. India reacted very slowly when it came to laws relating to cyber space crimes and even now, we are grappling with it with very few experts in the field. The system is yet to catch up with the enormity of the situation and we are facing new challenges on a daily basis in dealing with offences such as hacking, scamming, identity theft, ransomware, phishing, cyberstalking, child pornography, etc.,
We must learn from our mistakes and inadequacies and not be lagging-behind while dealing with AI/Robots which will very soon get into our world on a day-to-day basis. It is high time that we start educating ourselves with these developments and start a dialogue as to how we are going to handle the situation by bringing in appropriate amendments to existing laws or legislate enactments that will exclusively deal with this issue. Let us not remain lackadaisical thinking that this might not challenge us soon. It is only a matter of time and therefore, we ought to prepare ourselves to face it.
Scientific developments are here to stay and it cannot be stopped. The onus is upon us to prepare ourselves to counter its ill-effects. We now have the time to think about it. Why not use this time and look into what is happening around the world and take appropriate measures to bring in laws to handle the monster that is already staring at us.
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
[4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
[4/9, 07:29] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 07:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: Lordship 4th letter super congrats sir
SCIENCE LEAPS: LAW STAYS PUT
This article is an attempt to explore how the burgeoning sophistication of Artificial Intelligence (A.I) and Robots and their widespread deployment everywhere, from homes and hospitals to public spaces and the battlefield, necessitates a rethink of a wide variety of philosophical and public policy issues, and their uneasy interaction with the existing legal regimes thereby impelling a revamp of our existing law and policies. This situation is analogous to how policymakers and lawmakers had to approach and tackle issues of the Internet when it virtually took over the whole world in the 1990’s.
For the purpose of this article, a robot must be understood as a constructed system that displays both physical and mental agency but is not alive in the biological sense. The most common robot in the world at present is the I-Robot Roomba. This is a small robot that is capable of autonomously vacuum-cleaning your house. They are fully autonomous in the sense that they need no human assistance. They make rational decisions as they scoot around the floor. In the military, ground-based robots such as the Packbot (IRobot) and the Talon (Foster Middler) are becoming ubiquitous. These systems could be used to replace human soldiers in highly risky operations such as disabling explosives, attack on buildings, counter-insurgency operations etc. Autonomous warehouse robots have been put into operation, which appear to have their own mental agency as they avoid colliding against each other and reconfigure storage locations of items in the warehouse based on customer demand. Google has a fleet of self-driven cars, the prototypes of which have already hit the roads in the Unites States of America. Robots used as therapeutic aides are available and they are being used to assist individuals with severe motor disabilities in their homes. These are mere illustrations. More and more robots will eventually enter our daily lives in the coming decade. This surge in the emergence of robots into the functioning of our day-to-day lives is bound to result in a plethora of legislative challenges. As robots operating with sophisticated AI become more and more multipurpose, it will be trickier to imagine, a priori, as to how and where they may be used. In the extreme case (hopefully in the future) of a robot which is fully capable of performing everything that a human being can- there are few practical boundaries on what the robot cannot do. How does one legislate to legally reign in such a system? As robots become more autonomous, the question of where the liability rests when something goes wrong will assume relevance. This is an issue labyrinthine in its nature. Is it the manufacturer or the programmer or the user (who might have given an inappropriate or misleading instruction) severally, or a combination of all three jointly? The sheer variety of applications and tasks that robots can execute will, thus, lay enormous pressure on the existing legal system in a wide range of substantive areas including tort, contract, consumer protection, privacy and penal law among others. The internet, which emerged just 30 years back has virtually glued every other human being into cyber space and it has and continues to throw up new challenges for law enforcement. Humans never did imagine that development would happen at this startling pace. By the time a new law or an enforcement mechanism is brought into effect, there is further development, which makes it a struggle to keep pace with the challenges posed by cyber space. Therefore, it is crucial that we do not remain in a fool’s paradise thinking that robots will not get more autonomous and get into the real world, which up until now was in the domain of human beings. Given the benefits that robots might someday confer on humanity, should we, or can we, remain in control once they emerge superior to us in respect of certain abilities? ‘Jeopardy’ is a classic game show with a twist. The answers are given first and the contestants supply the questions. The two all-time champions of this show Ken Jennings and Brad Rutler were pitted against IBM’s Robot Watson. Watson is a deep question-answering super computer. It won hands down. With this IBM system, human monopoly over natural language was obliterated, rendering Watson the world’s go-to expert at Jeopardy. Watson’s success raises questions as to the role that humans would occupy once robots can perform a multitude of tasks traditionally delegated to human experts- and not just performing them but performing them more efficiently and effectively than humans. Today, scientists can come up with algorithms which enable AI to understand facial expressions and act accordingly. What happens if a driverless car, which is claimed to be safer than a human driven car, causes an accident and kills or grievously hurts someone? What happens if an autonomous robot misreads a facial expression and attacks a human being and causes death or injury? What happens if a malfunctioning AI mishandles a patient suffering from some disability while assisting him/her during a treatment? What happens if robots are programmed to carry out terrorist activities in a building or locality? Who should be made liable? These are looming and persistent questions for which there exists no satisfactory answers. There are other facets to this. Sex-Bots are being created using a combination of existing AI technology, sensory perception capabilities, synthetic physiological responses and affective computing. Proponents of sex-bots predict that these robots will facilitate sexual interaction and provide companionship for human users. The idea of fabrication of a woman for a man’s purpose can be traced back to pre-biblical myths. This historically regressive and oppressive belief that women are created to serve men is brought to life in the designing and programming of female-like robots. Anthromorphised robots that can interact with humans and learn from their own environment have already started hitting the market. Aiko is a female robot built out of silicone, which has a similar appearance and texture to the human skin. Actroid F technology now has taken it further and improved facial movements that allow it to detect and initiate human expressions. Sex-Bots are physical and interactive manifestations of a woman that are programmed into submission. These sex-bots do not have the capacity to decline, criticize or become dissatisfied with the user, unless they are programmed to do so. Documentaries like “The Mechanical Bride”, “My Sex-Robot” reflect the deleterious effects of this invention on the attitude of men towards women. The use of sex-bots and the potential creation of an industry that commoditizes the circumvention of female consent may de-value female personhood, encourage misogynistic reactions upon women and impair values about the role of women in society. Sex-Bots that appear stereotypically like a female and act as sexual slaves to their owners send a very damaging message about womanhood. Consent strengthens personal autonomy which is an integral facet of the right to life. It is an essential element of contract law, medical treatment and sexual interaction. Preserving human autonomy by ensuring the presence of consent is especially important in situations where lack of consent could negatively affect an individual’s physical and psychological integrity. How are we going to deal with this dangerous situation in the near future? When it comes to the liability and the question as to who is to be held liable for the acts of AI and Robots, there are several if’s and buts. The legal liability of AI systems depends on at least three factors:Whether AI is a product or a service? This is ill-defined in law; different commentators offer different views.
If a criminal offence is being considered, what is the mens rea required? It seems unlikely that AI programs will contravene laws that require knowledge that a criminal act was being committed; but it is highly possible they might contravene laws for which ‘a reasonable man would have known’ that a course of action could lead to an offence, and it is almost certain that they could contravene strict liability offences.
Whether the limitations of AI systems are communicated to a purchaser? Since AI systems have both general and specific limitations, legal cases on such issues may well be based on the specific wording of any warnings about such limitations.
There is also the question of who should be held liable. It will depend on which of the following models will apply (perpetrator-by-another; natural-probable- consequence; or direct liability):
• In a perpetrator-by-another offence, the person who instructs the AI system – either the user or the programmer – is likely to be found liable.
• In a natural-or-probable-consequence offence, liability could fall on anyone who might have reasonably foreseen the product being used in the way it was; the programmer, the vendor (of a product), or the service provider. The user is less likely to be blamed unless the instructions that came with the product/service spell out the limitations of the system and the possible consequences of misuse in unusual detail.
• AI programs may also be held liable for strict liability offences, in which case the programmer is likely to be found at fault.
However, in all cases where the programmer is deemed liable, there may be further debates: whether the fault lies with the programmer; the program designer; the expert who provided the knowledge; or the manager who appointed the inept expert, program designer or programmer?
Am I over-reacting to the situation? I believe I am not. Western countries which are the major contributors to this development are working at a feverish pace to simultaneously develop laws to ensure that legal liability is properly fixed in cases of adverse impacts caused by AI/Robots. A lot of study is going on and experts are churning out a lot of research to set down normative standards for an effective enforcement mechanism to fix liability. India reacted very slowly when it came to laws relating to cyber space crimes and even now, we are grappling with it with very few experts in the field. The system is yet to catch up with the enormity of the situation and we are facing new challenges on a daily basis in dealing with offences such as hacking, scamming, identity theft, ransomware, phishing, cyberstalking, child pornography, etc.,
We must learn from our mistakes and inadequacies and not be lagging-behind while dealing with AI/Robots which will very soon get into our world on a day-to-day basis. It is high time that we start educating ourselves with these developments and start a dialogue as to how we are going to handle the situation by bringing in appropriate amendments to existing laws or legislate enactments that will exclusively deal with this issue. Let us not remain lackadaisical thinking that this might not challenge us soon. It is only a matter of time and therefore, we ought to prepare ourselves to face it.
Scientific developments are here to stay and it cannot be stopped. The onus is upon us to prepare ourselves to counter its ill-effects. We now have the time to think about it. Why not use this time and look into what is happening around the world and take appropriate measures to bring in laws to handle the monster that is already staring at us.
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh
[4/9, 07:26] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
[4/9, 08:16] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 08:10] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248078005039054848?s=08
[4/9, 08:10] Sekarreporter 1: Madras HC directs TN police to arrest as well as seize two wheelers and four wheelers of those who roam around, without reasonable cause, after 1 pm everyday. Orders that their employers should also be informed about it @THChennai
[4/9, 08:16] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 08:14] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248079231692623872?s=08
[4/9, 08:15] Sekarreporter 1: N.KIRUBAKARAN, J) “Pandemic has no religion; It knows no region; It won’t come on its own; Unless there is an invitation; Crowding can lead to its aggravation; So maintain sanitation and reduce social interaction; That will alone prevent transmission.” https://t.co/SsrE5bzDCG https://t.co/0vLGUDCL4h
[4/9, 08:20] Sekarreporter 1: வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கு வழக்கறிஞர் உதவியாளர்கள் கோரிக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற வளாகத்தில் https://www.sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b1%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%9e%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b3%e0%af%81%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95/
[4/9, 08:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 09:38] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 08:53] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 09:37] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 09:11] Vimal mhc advt — Lordship Article contains such wonderful information with deep study in AI and where we are yet to go either to Challenge,Compete if so as lordship expressed the non existence of rules. Million Thanks to lordship. Vimal B.Crimson.
[4/9, 09:37] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹
[4/9, 09:41] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 08:53] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 09:37] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 09:11] Vimal Admk: Lordship Article contains such wonderful information with deep study in AI and where we are yet to go either to Challenge,Compete if so as lordship expressed the non existence of rules. Million Thanks to lordship. Vimal B.Crimson.
[4/9, 09:37] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹
[4/9, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the Centre having allocated a relatively low amount of ₹510 crore from the State Disaster Risk Management Fund (SDRMF) for Tamil Nadu, despite it having recorded the second highest number of patients who have tested positive for COVID-19, in the entire country. Justices N. Kirubakaran and R. Hemalatha suo motu https://www.sekarreporter.com/the-madras-high-court-on-wednesday-expressed-concern-over-the-centre-having-allocated-a-relatively-low-amount-of-%e2%82%b9510-crore-from-the-state-disaster-risk-management-fund-sdrmf-for-tamil-nadu/
[4/9, 10:52] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 10:49] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 10:49] Sekarreporter 1: Sir I request you to report what is happening in Madurai Bench. For this what is it that you require? I require message from madurai bench i didn’t get message from madurai advts please madurai advts please send message regarding madurai function judgements to me my cell no 9445430817 or my mail address sekarrepoter1@gmail.com
[4/9, 10:49] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹
[4/9, 10:49] Sekarreporter 1: Madras most of the advts send message to me
[4/9, 10:51] Sekarreporter 1: Please madurai advts send ur good efforts in court or write about ur senior only supporting of judiciary news published our WhatsApp news channel 🌹
[4/9, 11:47] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 11:00] Mohithenbasha Mba Advt: Madurai Advocates are doing good, Senior Advocates Ajmal Khan, Veera Kathiravan, N. Krishnaveni and Several Advocates n Associations had Given Relief Funds n Essential Commodities to Needy Young Advocates n Now TNBC with Members Thalaimuthu Arasu, Ashok, Prabu in Coordination with Associations are inviting Application Form to give Corona Relief Funds
[4/9, 11:47] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹
[4/9, 11:59] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 11:57] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248135318433193984?s=08
[4/9, 11:58] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 10:52] Musthac Advt: ஐயா, கடந்த 05.07.2005, தமிழகத்தில் அனைத்து வகையான கட்டப்பஞ்சாயத்துகளையும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் முற்றுபுள்ளி வைத்து ஒழித்த தினம். K.Gopal vs The State of Tamilnadu, in before Hon’ble Chief Justice Mr. Markandey Katju and Hon’ble Justice F.M.Ibrahim Kalifullah இந்த வழக்கில் மனுதாரரின் சார்பாக எனது சீனியர் மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர், அகில இந்திய பார் கவுன்சிலின் துணை தலைவர் திரு. S. பிரபாகரன் அவர்களின் திறமையான வாதுரையை இன்றளவும் யாராலும் மறக்க இயலாது. காவல்துறையோ, ஊர் பஞ்சாயத்தோ, கிராம சபாவோ, தனிப்பட்ட அரசியல் செல்வாக்கோ யாராக இருந்தாலும் கட்டப்பஞ்சாயத்து, கங்காரூ கோர்ட், சட்டவிரோத தீர்ப்பு என அனைத்தையும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தடை விதித்தது. சீனியர் திரு. S. பிரபாகரன் அவர்களின் பெரும் முயற்சியால் கிடைத்த இந்த மாபெரும் தீர்ப்பை மற்ற மாநிலங்களும் பின்பற்றிய வரலாறு உண்டு. நன்றி 🙏- முகம்மது முஸ்தகீம் ராஜா, Mohammed Musthaqeem Raja [4/9, 10:56] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹 https://www.sekarreporter.com/4-9-1052-musthac-advt-%e0%ae%90%e0%ae%af%e0%ae%be-%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%9f%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4-05-07-2005-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b4%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf/
[4/9, 12:19] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:18] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248140289044131840?s=08
[4/9, 12:18] Sekarreporter 1: MMBA அசாதாரண சூழ்நிலை நிலவி வரும் இவ்வேளையிலே, வழக்கறிஞர்கள் குடும்பத்தாரின் அத்தியாவசிய தேவைகளை பூர்த்தி செய்யும் பொருட்டு MMBA -ன் சார்பாக முதற்கட்டமாக 100 இளம் வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கு(5 வருட அனுபவத்திற்கு கீழ்) சுமார் ₹1000 மதிப்பில் அரிசி, பருப்பு உள்ளிட்ட அத்தியாவசிய பொருட்கள் வழங்குவது என்று முடிவு செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது. மேற்படி உதவி பொருட்கள் தேவைப்படும் வழக்கறிஞர்கள் MMBA-ன் தலைவர் மற்றும் பொதுச் செயலாளரை தொடர்பு கொள்ளவும் .உதவி பெறுபவர்கள் பற்றிய விபரம் ரகசியமாக வைத்துக் கொள்ளப்படும். அதேபோல் இத்திட்டத்திற்கு நன்கொடைகள் வரவேற்கப்படுகின்றன.
தொடர்புக்கு …. ந.கிருஷ்ணவேணி தலைவர் – 9444069933
ந.இளங்கோ பொதுச்செயலாளர்
9944244477
[4/9, 12:21] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:19] Musthac Advt: சேகர் சார், இந்த K.Gopal வழக்கு பெரும் போராட்டமாகவே அமைந்தது. சீனியர் S. பிரபாகரன் அவர்கள் இந்த வழக்கிற்காக பெரும் சிரத்தை எடுத்ததை நான் உடனிருந்து பார்த்திருக்கிறேன். அவருடைய உழைப்பு எங்களைப் போன்ற ஜூனியர்களுக்கு ஒரு பாடம்.
சாதாரணமாக இந்த உத்தரவு கிடைக்கவில்லை. அதிகமான மேற்கோள் தீர்ப்புக்களை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர் சங்க நூலகத்தில் அமர்ந்து இந்த வழக்கின் மனுதாரர் வழக்கறிஞர் திரு. D. லிங்கேஸ்வரன்- தற்போதைய மாண்புமிகு மாவட்ட நீதிபதி- அவர்கள் எடுத்து வர அதனை இரவு, பகல் என பாராமல் தொடர்ந்து படிப்பார் சீனியர் திரு.S. பிரபாகரன் அவர்கள். மேலும், மதிய உணவுக்கு கூட நேரமில்லாமல் சீனியர் அவர்கள் நீதிமன்றத்திலேயே இந்த வழக்கிற்காக அதிகமாக படிப்பார், குறிப்புகளை எடுப்பார். திடீர் திடீரென உச்சநீதிமன்ற, உயர்நீதிமன்ற முன் தீர்ப்பு குறிப்புகளை கொடுப்பார். இந்த வழக்கிலிருந்து ஜூனியர்கள் நாங்கள் நிறைய சட்ட விடயங்களை கற்றுக்கொண்டோம்- முகம்மது முஸ்தகீம் ராஜா Mohammed Musthaqeem Raja
[4/9, 12:21] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏼🌹🌹
[4/9, 12:30] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248142618854187008?s=08
[4/9, 12:26] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:25] Mohamad Rafic Eb: 👏👏👏👏
[4/9, 12:25] Mohamad Rafic Eb: 👏👏👏👏👏
[4/9, 12:43] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248146103934971904?s=08
[4/9, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: The two orders pronounced by the Hon’ble Division Bench comprising Justice N.Kirubakaran and Justice Hemalatha is very timely and puts pertinent questions regarding
No:1 Why Rs 560 Crore alone is sanctioned when Tamilnadu stands in No 2 in the Country towards COVID 19. Whereas, the other States were allotted huge money for preparedness and for rehabilitation.
No 2: Why no medical research was not given importance especially for Sidda,Ayurveda and other alternative medicines.
Judiciously, the bench posted several questions about the standards adopted in allocation of funds by the Union Government.
It is be understood, that, National revenue by way of IT, GST and other indirect taxes Tamil Nadu is in top 5 states in the country.
Let’s hope, good things will happen, because of the orders passed by the Bench headed by Justice N.Kirubakaran.
[4/9, 12:40] N. Senthil Kumar Advocate: 🙏🙏🙏🙏
[4/9, 16:22] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:18] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248201140124049409?s=08
[4/9, 16:18] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 14:52] tn bc member senior advt Viduthalai: Thank you
[4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: Bc member senior advt viduthalai one lakh to bar council fund
[4/9, 16:22] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248200047717519360?s=08
[4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 13:30] Bar Council New Secretry: Mr. R. C. Paul Kanakaraj Member, Bar Council of Tamil nadu and Puducherry Contributed One Lakh Rupees towards Advocates Relief Fund. Congratulations sir.
[4/9, 16:13] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹 https://t.co/SB7R8BusGw
[4/9, 16:22] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248201748394553345?s=08
[4/9, 16:21] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 14:19] Sekarreporter 1: Aag a kumar sir one lakh towards cm fund congrats sit
[4/9, 14:19] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🙏🏼
[4/9, 16:23] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248200047717519360?s=08
[4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 13:30] Bar Council New Secretry: Mr. R. C. Paul Kanakaraj Member, Bar Council of Tamil nadu and Puducherry Contributed One Lakh Rupees towards Advocates Relief Fund. Congratulations sir.
[4/9, 16:13] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹 https://t.co/SB7R8BusGw
[4/9, 16:23] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:18] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248201140124049409?s=08
[4/9, 16:18] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 14:52] tn bc member senior advt Viduthalai: Thank you
[4/9, 16:16] Sekarreporter 1: Bc member senior advt viduthalai one lakh to bar council fund
[4/9, 16:23] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248201748394553345?s=08
[4/9, 16:21] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 14:19] Sekarreporter 1: Aag a kumar sir one lakh towards cm fund congrats sit
[4/9, 14:19] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🙏🏼
[4/9, 16:33] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:30] Sekarreporter 1: Send short notes about ur seniors
[4/9, 16:30] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹 with photos
[4/9, 16:45] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:44] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:43] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248207426295226369?s=08
[4/9, 16:43] Sekarreporter 1: கொரோனா தொற்று ஆரம்ப கட்ட அறிகுறிகள் உள்ளவர்களை தனிமைப்படுத்தும் வார்டுகளாக மட்டுமே ரயில் பெட்டிகள் பயன்படுத்தப்படும் என தெற்கு ரயில்வே சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் விளக்கம்
COVID19 | #CoronaVirus | #SouthernRailway
[4/9, 16:44] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 13:38] advt krishnamorthy : Regarding writpetition convertingoof railcoahes in to hospitals the railway counsel said that the union government is converting railway coaches only into isolation wards not hospitals. I have argued if covid19 positive patients if suppose kept in the railway coach isolation if the patients turned into critical at midnight or early morning how would you shift them to the hospital CONCERNED in transit if they dies who would be responsible. WHETHER Art 21 is available TO covid19 patients or not.Then railway counsel srinivasamurthy said Italy and Spain position. I said their constitution is entirely different and asked him to speak about our fundamental rights.His lordship mr JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN SAID YES COVID 19 PATIENTS HAVE COVERED UNDER ART 21 BUT MR KRISHNAMURTHY COVID19 VIRUS DOESN’T KNOW ARTI 21.HAVING HEARD ALL SIDES ARGUMENTS ORDERS WILL BE PRONOUNCED BY TODAY OR TOMORROW. HIS LORDSHIP SAID THAT HE WOULD DISPOSE OF THE WRIT PETITION
[4/9, 16:12] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏼
[4/9, 16:44] Sekarreporter 1: For railway advt ravinthiren argued
[4/9, 17:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/hKYl6Dkf6ME
[4/9, 17:21] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 17:20] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248216585426239488?s=08
[4/9, 17:20] Sekarreporter 1: கொரோனா நோய்த்தொற்றை தேசிய்ப்பேரிடராக அறிவித்து, சிறப்பு செயல்பாட்டுக்குழு அமைத்து தடுப்பு மற்றும் கட்டுப்படுத்தும் நடவடிக்கை மேற்கொள்ளவும், தனியார் மருத்துவமனைகள் கட்டணக்கோள்ளைக்கு வழிவகுக்கும் அரசாணையை ரத்து செய்யவும்.
மக்கள் உரிமை பாதுகாப்பு மையம் சென்னைகிளை செயலாளர் வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.ஜிம்ராஜ் மில்ட்டன், சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் 2 பொதுநல வழக்கு தாக்கல்:
1.கொரோனா நோய்தொற்றை தேசிய பேரிடர் மேலாண்மை சட்டத்தின் கீழ் செயல்பாட்டுக்குழு அமைத்து தேசிய நோய்த்தடுப்பு மையம் வழிகாட்டுதலின்படி பருண்மையாக செயல்திட்டம் வகுத்து கொரோனா நோய்த்தடுப்பு மற்றும் கட்டுப்படுத்தும் நடவடிக்கைகளை மேற்கொள்ளவும்,
2.கொரோனா தோற்றுநோயினால் பாதிக்கப்பட்டவர்கள் தனியார் மருத்துவமனையில் கட்டணம் செலுத்தி சிகிச்சை பார்க்கவேண்டும் என்ற அரசாணையை ரத்துசெய்து இலவச சிகிச்சை வழங்கவும் இரண்டு பொதுநல வழக்குகள் (W.P.7414 of 2020, W.P.7456 of 2020) தாக்கல் செய்தார்.
மேற்கண்ட 2 வழக்குகள் இன்று மான்புமிகு நீதிபதிகள் கிருபாகரன் & ஹேமலதா அமர்வில் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் விசாரணைக்கு எடுத்துக்கொள்ளப்பட்டது. அரசு தரப்பில் ஆஜரான கூடுதல் தலைமை வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.அரவிந்த் பாண்டியன் அவர்கள் பல்வேறு விஷயங்களை வலியுறுத்தி தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட இம்மனுவின் மீது அரசு நடவடிக்கை எடுத்துவருவதாகவும் குறிப்பான விவரங்கள் இருந்தால் தெரிவிக்கும்படியும் தெரிவித்தார்.
• மனுதாரர் தரப்பில் மருத்துவர்கள், செவிலியர்கள் & தூய்மை பணியாளர்கள் உரிய PPE உள்ளிட்ட பாதுகாப்பு உபகரணங்கள் வழங்கவும், வடசென்னை & பின்தங்கிய கிராமங்களில் உள்ள அடித்தட்டு மக்களுக்கு பொது சமையற்கூடம் அமைத்து உணவு வழங்கவும் சாலையோரங்களில் வசிக்கின்ற மக்களுக்கு தங்குமிடம் மற்றும் உணவுக்கு உத்திரவாதம் அளிக்கவும், 2 லட்ச வெளிமாநில தொழிலாளர்கள் பிரச்சனைபற்றி முன்வைக்கப்பட்டது. மேலும் தேசிய பேரிடர் மேலாண்மை சட்டத்தின் கீழ் வட்டார அளவில் செயல்பாட்டு குழுக்கள் அமைத்து நிவாரணப்பணிகளை செய்யவும் இவற்றில் ஏற்கனவே அரசிடம் பதிவு செய்துள்ள 1100, மருத்துவர்கள், 3500 மருத்துவ பணியாளர்கள் உள்ளிட்ட 45,000 தன்னார்வலர்களை பயன்படுத்த நடவடிக்கை எடுக்கவும் வலியுறுத்தப்பட்டது.
• மேற்படி கோரிக்கைகள் மீது உடனடியாக நடவடிக்கை எடுப்பது பற்றி அரசுக்கு உத்திரவிடப்பட்டு, இதுபற்றிய அரசின் கருத்தினை தெரிவிக்க வழக்கு இருவாரங்களுக்கு ஒத்திவைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.
[4/9, 17:31] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 17:02] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:43] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248207426295226369?s=08
[4/9, 17:02] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 16:58] Sir P. Srinivasan. standing Counsel: srinivasa Moorthy Argued for Mr Chandrasekar Sr Panel counsel for Union of India pls
[4/9, 17:00] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 13:05] Sir P. Srinivasan. standing Counsel: Sekar sir . Just this Railway matter over . Justice SVNJ after hearing the arguments advanced by me for a railways ,as well AAG RajaGopal sir and other Respective advocates ..His lordship may pronounce the order today or Tomorrow. Once I receive And I will forwarded the same to u . Thanks pls
[4/9, 16:53] Sekarreporter 1: 🙏🏼
[4/9, 17:02] Sir P. Srinivasan. standing Counsel: P. Srinivasan . Standing counsel for Railways
[4/9, 17:39] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 17:37] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/UrGm6kxl-H4
[4/9, 17:37] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 17:17] Rajesh Mha Librarian: PIL- Honble Mr justice N Kirubhakaran and Ms Justice Hemalatha bench directed the government to ensure social distancing while regular supply of essential commodities during the month of may in view of lockdown. The bench further advised the government to procure the agri products from the farmers directly and to avoid intermediaries.
[4/9, 17:35] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹
[4/9, 17:47] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 17:46] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248223181329928192?s=08
[4/9, 17:46] Sekarreporter 1: தமிழக சிறைத்துறையின் இந்த நடவடிக்கைக்கு பாராட்டு தெரிவித்த நீதிபதிகள்,tssj kalyana Sundaram j விசாரணையை 2 வாரங்களுக்கு தள்ளி வைத்தனர்.
[4/9, 20:02] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 08:53] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248066822756171776?s=08
[4/9, 13:05] Sures Mba Advt: The advent of Artificial Intelligence is become indispensible to mankind in the course of his routine at home and at work. The effective functioning and malfunctioning is attributable to a number of external agencies both human functions and non-human functions . When negligence or even mens rea can be alleged for human errors, non-human errors would probably escape the legal system of supervision.
Framing laws to guide the legal system including the justice delivery system to tackle the so called monsters who negatively use the AI has become the necessity of the current situation.
May be a PIL to debate this topic can also be exercised to tickle the law commission with an order of the court.
The whole globe with the exception of China are sitting in their homes fearing the pandemic. Some call it inadequate preparation to handle the situation, and as always throw the blame on the state administration when lack of human wisdom from the media education is forgotten as usual. Well, it was only an actual tsunami which thought us safeguards to future tsunamis so will this pandemic teach us to control such eventualities in future. Once again we would require the assistance of Artificial Intelligence to support us to discover antedotes .
It’s high time suitable laws be framed to tackle the monsters of Artificial Intelligence.
Justice Anand Venkatesh’s thoughts has triggered our thoughts during lockdown. The legal luminaries should find time to proceed furtheron.
[4/9, 20:07] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248258620824760320?s=08
[4/9, 20:07] Sekarreporter 1: of external agencies both human functions and non-human functions . When negligence or even mens rea can be alleged for human errors, non-human errors would probably escape the legal system of supervision.
Framing laws to guide the legal system including the justice delivery system to tackle the so called monsters who negatively use the AI has become the necessity of the current situation.
May be a PIL to debate this topic can also be exercised to tickle the law commission with an order of the court.
The whole globe with the exception of China are sitting in their homes fearing the pandemic. Some call it inadequate preparation to handle the situation, and as always throw the blame on the state administration when lack of human wisdom from the media education is forgotten as usual. Well, it was only an actual tsunami which thought us safeguards to future tsunamis so will this pandemic teach us to control such eventualities in future. Once again we would require the assistance of Artificial Intelligence to support us to discover antedotes .
It’s high time suitable laws be framed to tackle the monsters of Artificial Intelligence.
Justice Anand Venkatesh’s thoughts has triggered our thoughts during lockdown. The legal luminaries should find time to proceed furtheron.
[4/9, 20:07] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 20:07] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248258620824760320?s=08
[4/9, 20:07] Sekarreporter 1: of external agencies both human functions and non-human functions . When negligence or even mens rea can be alleged for human errors, non-human errors would probably escape the legal system of supervision.
Framing laws to guide the legal system including the justice delivery system to tackle the so called monsters who negatively use the AI has become the necessity of the current situation.
May be a PIL to debate this topic can also be exercised to tickle the law commission with an order of the court.
The whole globe with the exception of China are sitting in their homes fearing the pandemic. Some call it inadequate preparation to handle the situation, and as always throw the blame on the state administration when lack of human wisdom from the media education is forgotten as usual. Well, it was only an actual tsunami which thought us safeguards to future tsunamis so will this pandemic teach us to control such eventualities in future. Once again we would require the assistance of Artificial Intelligence to support us to discover antedotes .
It’s high time suitable laws be framed to tackle the monsters of Artificial Intelligence.
Justice Anand Venkatesh’s thoughts has triggered our thoughts during lockdown. The legal luminaries should find time to proceed furtheron.
[4/9, 21:24] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 21:22] Sekarreporter 1: [4/9, 21:22] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1248277495029235720?s=08
[4/9, 21:22] Sekarreporter 1: N.kirubakaran j bench full order Were it left to me to decide whether we should have Government without newspapers, or newspapers without Government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.” https://t.co/yMubFVwpFw https://t.co/ZtqWrNNhEn
[4/9, 21:22] Sekarreporter 1: Thomas Jefferson
The importance of newspapers could be well understood by the abovestatement of Thomas Jefferson, a leading spokesperson for democracy, the third President of United States of America from 1801 to 1809, who declared “all men are created equal”.
[4/9, 21:22] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹
