Additional Advocate General Gowtham, appearing for the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, informed the court that the suspension order was passed based on serious allegations raised against the Inspector. It was submitted that there were screenshots of WhatsApp chat which would show that the Inspector had demanded gratification for not proceeding with an investigation. The AAG also submitted that the Inspector habitually indulged in such activities, but had approached the single judge claiming that she was a victim.

[03/07, 13:43] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-motivated-inspector-suspension-order-stay-kept-in-abeyance-539707
[03/07, 13:44] sekarreporter1: Additional Advocate General Gowtham, appearing for the Tamil Nadu Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, informed the court that the suspension order was passed based on serious allegations raised against the Inspector. It was submitted that there were screenshots of WhatsApp chat which would show that the Inspector had demanded gratification for not proceeding with an investigation. The AAG also submitted that the Inspector habitually indulged in such activities, but had approached the single judge claiming that she was a victim.