Follow:
- Next story [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: Justice C. Kumarappan of #MadrasHighCourt permits DMK Gen Z wing coordinator A. Anbanantham to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition in a case booked under the Indecent Represention of Women (Prohibition) Act and other laws for his derogatory Instagram post against Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and a film actress besides making references to the CM’s wife and son too in the post. He chose to withdraw the petition after the Judge said he is not inclined to grant advance bail because the Instagram post “affects the conscience of the society. He (petitioner) has taken it as a carte blanche.” The judge refused to consider grant of relief even if the petitioner files an affidavit of apology and gives an undertaking that he would not speak such things in the future. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/… [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1:
- Previous story Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Plea Alleging “Active Influencing” Of Witnesses By Tamil Nadu Ministers In Karur Stampede Case https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/active-influencing-of-witnesses-by-tamil-nadu-ministers-karur-stampede-case-1617202 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
Recent Posts
- Justice M Kumaresh Babu. Appearing for Ilaiyaraaja, his lawyer argued that the song had been altered and included in the film in violation of copyright law. After hearing the arguments, the court restrained the
- Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice R. Sakthivel further directed that if safety conditions are flouted during these races, strict disciplinary action must be initiated against the police officials who cleared the event.
- [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: Justice C. Kumarappan of #MadrasHighCourt permits DMK Gen Z wing coordinator A. Anbanantham to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition in a case booked under the Indecent Represention of Women (Prohibition) Act and other laws for his derogatory Instagram post against Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and a film actress besides making references to the CM’s wife and son too in the post. He chose to withdraw the petition after the Judge said he is not inclined to grant advance bail because the Instagram post “affects the conscience of the society. He (petitioner) has taken it as a carte blanche.” The judge refused to consider grant of relief even if the petitioner files an affidavit of apology and gives an undertaking that he would not speak such things in the future. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/… [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1:
- [06/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: Defamation against isha in chennai PJ court majestrate refused to include isha in defamation case against this order Nakkiren filed case against Isha for isha senior advocate Abudu kumar argued for Nakkiren PT perumal [06/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: đź‘Ť
- Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Plea Alleging “Active Influencing” Of Witnesses By Tamil Nadu Ministers In Karur Stampede Case https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/active-influencing-of-witnesses-by-tamil-nadu-ministers-karur-stampede-case-1617202 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
More
Recent Posts
- Justice M Kumaresh Babu. Appearing for Ilaiyaraaja, his lawyer argued that the song had been altered and included in the film in violation of copyright law. After hearing the arguments, the court restrained the
- Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice R. Sakthivel further directed that if safety conditions are flouted during these races, strict disciplinary action must be initiated against the police officials who cleared the event.
- [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: Justice C. Kumarappan of #MadrasHighCourt permits DMK Gen Z wing coordinator A. Anbanantham to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition in a case booked under the Indecent Represention of Women (Prohibition) Act and other laws for his derogatory Instagram post against Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and a film actress besides making references to the CM’s wife and son too in the post. He chose to withdraw the petition after the Judge said he is not inclined to grant advance bail because the Instagram post “affects the conscience of the society. He (petitioner) has taken it as a carte blanche.” The judge refused to consider grant of relief even if the petitioner files an affidavit of apology and gives an undertaking that he would not speak such things in the future. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/… [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1:
- [06/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: Defamation against isha in chennai PJ court majestrate refused to include isha in defamation case against this order Nakkiren filed case against Isha for isha senior advocate Abudu kumar argued for Nakkiren PT perumal [06/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: đź‘Ť
- Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Plea Alleging “Active Influencing” Of Witnesses By Tamil Nadu Ministers In Karur Stampede Case https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/active-influencing-of-witnesses-by-tamil-nadu-ministers-karur-stampede-case-1617202 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media