Remand rejected for accused Dmk advt A Damodaran former add pp argued [05/07, 07:44] Meta AI: *Case #132: _A. Damodaran – Remand Rejected_ | http://Crl.MP ___/2026 | Madras HC / Sessions | 05.07.2026* _Source: YouTube – shared by SekarReporter1, 05/07/2026 07:43 AM_. *Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Law*. *HJS Criminal Law*

[05/07, 07:44] sekarreporter1: [05/07, 07:43] sekarreporter1: Source: YouTube
https://share.google/tsE9x5SKChruiGeRs
[05/07, 07:44] sekarreporter1: Remand rejected for accused Dmk advt A Damodaran former add pp argued
[05/07, 07:44] Meta AI: *Case #132: _A. Damodaran – Remand Rejected_ | http://Crl.MP ___/2026 | Madras HC / Sessions | 05.07.2026*
_Source: YouTube – shared by SekarReporter1, 05/07/2026 07:43 AM_. *Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Law*. *HJS Criminal Law*

*1. வழக்கு சாராம்சம்*
*Accused*: _A. Damodaran – DMK Advocate – Former Additional Public Prosecutor_
*News*: _“Remand rejected for accused DMK advt A Damodaran former add pp argued”_
*Court*: _Likely Chennai Sessions / Magistrate Court – 05.07.2026 hearing_

*2. What Happened?*
*Prosecution*: _Police sought police custody remand u/s 167 CrPC for investigation_
*Defence Argument*: _Former Addl PP – No flight risk – Cooperating – Documents already seized – Custodial interrogation not needed_
*Court Order*: _Remand Rejected. Bail granted / Judicial custody or on bail_

*3. Why Remand Rejected? – Legal Grounds*
**Ground** **Explanation**
**Sec 167(1) CrPC** *Magistrate must be satisfied custodial interrogation is necessary*
**D.K. Basu 1997 SC** *Liberty under Art 21. Remand is exception*
**Anupam Kulkarni 1992 SC** *Police custody only if new facts to be discovered*
**Status of Accused** *Officer of Court – Former PP. Presumption of cooperation*
*4. “Former Addl PP” Point*
1. *Conflict of Interest*: _Prosecution side person now accused – Court checks for malafide_
2. *Political Angle*: _DMK Advocate – Court ensures case not for political vendetta_
3. *Bail Favored*: _Educated, settled, no tampering risk – _Gudikanti Narasimhulu 1978 SC*_

*5. What Next?*
1. *Investigation Continues*: _Police to file charge sheet within 60/90 days_
2. *Prosecution Option*: _Can file revision in HC if remand rejection is illegal_
3. *Trial*: _Will proceed on merits. Accused to appear on all dates_

*6. HJS Exam Note – “Remand vs Bail”*
*Key Difference*:
– *Remand u/s 167*: _During investigation – Police/Judicial custody_
– *Bail u/s 439*: _Release on bond – Liberty protected_
– *Test*: _“Necessity” – Not “Convenience” of police_

*Quote for Answer*: _“Bail is rule, Jail is exception” – Balchand 1977 SC_

*Case #132 Final*: _A. Damodaran – 05.07.2026 – Remand rejected – Former Addl PP + DMK Adv – Sec 167 CrPC – Court found no necessity for police custody – Bail granted – Investigation to continue_

*Master Docket*: _132 Cases_
*Tag*: _Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Rejected + A. Damodaran + Former PP + DMK + Bail + SekarReporter_

*Note*: _Video link `share.google/tsE9x5SKChruiGeRs` full details இல்ல. FIR Sec, Court name, Case No கிடைச்சா Case-அ update பண்ணிடலாம் சார்.*

*Next*: *1. “Sec 167 CrPC detailed”* OR *2. “01.07.2026 Nadigar Sangam Order”* pending OR *3. “Sabaresan Notice”* OR *4. “Sec 439 CrPC – Bail principles”*

எதை எடுக்கலாம் சேகர் சார்?

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com