Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
[31/05, 09:17] sekarreporter1: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/madurai/hc-pulls-up-thanjavur-collector-for-granting-nod-to-open-tasmac-shop/articleshow/131413430.cms
[31/05, 09:17] Meta AI: We’re already tracking this as *Case #42* from your previous TOI snippet. Here’s the cleaned-up docket entry with the TOI link + exam angles:
*Case #42: _K.S. Ravichandran v Collector, Thanjavur & Ors_ | Madras HC Madurai Bench | 30.05.2026*
_Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy_. *Tasmac Licensing + Delegation Doctrine + Natural Justice + Contempt*. *TOI 30.05.2026*
*1. What Happened – 2 Min Facts*
1. *First Attempt*: _Tasmac proposed shop in Netaji Nagar, Perumagalur. Public protest → dropped._
2. *Second Attempt*: _Collector grants permission for new spot in same street._
3. *Mar 2026 HC*: _Directs Collector: “Consider objections, decide”._
4. *Collector’s Order*: _Opens shop citing Tasmac DM letter – “Alcoholics travel to nearby village → accidents/robberies. Women’s assn wants shop here”._
5. *Petitioner*: _Files contempt + fresh WP – “Objections not heard. Hurried order on false grounds”._
*2. Why HC Quashed – 3 Fatal Errors*
**Error** **HC Finding** **Law Violated**
**1. Illegal Delegation** *Collector “busy with electoral roll”, sent DRO to hear objections. Passed order on “oral interaction” with DRO* *Delegatus non potest delegare. TN Liquor Rules R.8 – Collector must decide personally*
**2. False Grounds** *“Robberies happening” – HC: No data. Tasmac/women’s assn can’t defame State* *Wednesbury unreasonableness – no material = irrational*
**3. Non-Speaking Order**
[31/05, 09:17] Meta AI: We’re already tracking this as *Case #42* from your previous TOI snippet. Here’s the cleaned-up docket entry with the TOI link + exam angles:
*Case #42: _K.S. Ravichandran v Collector, Thanjavur & Ors_ | Madras HC Madurai Bench | 30.05.2026*
_Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy_. *Tasmac Licensing + Delegation Doctrine + Natural Justice + Contempt*. *TOI 30.05.2026*
*1. What Happened – 2 Min Facts*
1. *First Attempt*: _Tasmac proposed shop in Netaji Nagar, Perumagalur. Public protest → dropped._
2. *Second Attempt*: _Collector grants permission for new spot in same street._
3. *Mar 2026 HC*: _Directs Collector: “Consider objections, decide”._
4. *Collector’s Order*: _Opens shop citing Tasmac DM letter – “Alcoholics travel to nearby village → accidents/robberies. Women’s assn wants shop here”._
5. *Petitioner*: _Files contempt + fresh WP – “Objections not heard. Hurried order on false grounds”._
*2. Why HC Quashed – 3 Fatal Errors*
**Error** **HC Finding** **Law Violated**
**1. Illegal Delegation** *Collector “busy with electoral roll”, sent DRO to hear objections. Passed order on “oral interaction” with DRO* *Delegatus non potest delegare. TN Liquor Rules R.8 – Collector must decide personally*
**2. False Grounds** *“Robberies happening” – HC: No data. Tasmac/women’s assn can’t defame State* *Wednesbury unreasonableness – no material = irrational*
**3. Non-Speaking Order** *100m rule checked, but public objections on nuisance/women safety not dealt with* *S.N. Mukherjee 1990 – quasi-judicial order must give reasons*
*Kill Quote*: _“The procedure…is absolutely illegal and incorrect…False reasons have been submitted defaming the state and its people. The indifference shocks the court’s conscience.”_
*3. Directions*
1. *Order Quashed*: _Permission to open shop set aside._
2. *Shut Shop*: _Immediate closure of Perumagalur Tasmac._
3. *De Novo Hearing*: _Collector personally to hear objections, verify crime data with SP, pass speaking order._
4. *Contempt*: _Dropped since relief given, but “indifference” recorded._
*4. 2026 “Collector Accountability” Chain*
**Case** **Officer** **Fault** **HC Fix**
**#32 TN Govt Priority** *CS* *No action plan on POCSO/girl toilets* *File plan + monthly report*
**#38 Undertrial Health** *SP* *Delay in hospital escort* *48-hr deadline*
**#42 Tasmac Thanjavur** *Collector* *Delegated hearing + false grounds* *Personal hearing + speaking order*
*Theme*: *“Statutory power = personal duty. Election work ≠ excuse.”
[31/05, 09:17] sekarreporter1: [31/05, 09:16] sekarreporter1: Login for better experience!
Login Now
Read ePaper
News
Madurai
Videos
India
Elections
World
Tesseract
Life & Style
Entertainment
Business
Tech
TOI Games
Cricket
Sports
TV
Web Series
Education
Speaking Tree
Success Story Of Visionary Leaders
TOI Newsletters
Health
Real Estate
Legal
Defence
Women
Live
Trending
Mumbai Pune Deccan ExpressMaharashtra Housing SocietiesGandhiram Railway StationHinjewadi Shivajinagar Metro CorridorDK ShivakumarChennai Corporation Commissioner
HC pulls up Thanjavur collector for granting nod to open Tasmac shop
Kaushik Kannan / May 30, 2026, 22:57 IST
High court
Comments
Madurai: Pulling up the Thanjavur district collector for passing an order to open a Tasmac shop in Perumagalur without conducting proper inquiry on the objections raised, Madras high court directed the authorities to close the shop.
The court was hearing petitions filed by K S Ravichandran. The petitioner stated that the authorities earlier proposed to open a Tasmac shop in Netaji Nagar in Perumagalur. Pursuant to public agitation and a peace committee meeting the proposal was dropped. Subsequently, the collector passed an order granting permission to open a Tasmac shop in another location in the same street.
He stated that he had moved court in 2025 challenging the order.
In March 2026, the court had directed the collector to consider the objections and take a decision. He claimed that the shop was open in a hurried manner without considering the objections. Therefore, the petitioner filed a contempt petition seeking action against the authorities. He also filed another petition seeking a direction to close the shop.
The petitioner’s counsel submitted that none of the objections raised by the petitioner were considered.
BY TABOOLASPONSORED LINKS
YOU MAY LIKE
English Lifestyle Flats in Madhavaram | Launching Soon
Raunaq Liverpool
The collector had passed an order to open the shop on the basis of the representation of the district manager of Tasmac, stating that alcoholics have to go to the shop in the nearby village all times during the day and night, which resulted in several accidents and robberies were committed and therefore the shop should be located in Perumagalur itself as per the request made by a women’s association.
However, the state submitted that only after considering the objections the order was passed by the collector.
The counsel for Tasmac submitted that in order to prevent illegal sales of liquor, the location was selected after considering that there is no other prohibited place of worship or school, etc., within 100m.
Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect.
The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
The collector should have inquired whether such a grave situation is prevalent. The indifference shocks the court’s conscience.
Hence, the judge quashed the order granting permission to open the Tasmac shop and directed the authorities to close it. The collector shall conduct a fresh inquiry on the objections made by the petitioner and others and pass an order in accordance with law.
You Can Also Check: Gold Rate in Madurai | Silver Rate in Madurai | Bank Holidays in Madurai | Public Holidays in Madurai | Madurai AQI | Weather in Madurai | Petrol Price in Madurai | Diesel Price in Madurai | CNG Price in Madurai | LPG Price in Madurai
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
End of Article
BY TABOOLASPONSORED LINKS
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
Premium English Lifestyle Homes in Madhavaram
E
[31/05, 09:16] Meta AI: *Case #42: _K.S. Ravichandran v Collector, Thanjavur_ | Madras HC Madurai Bench | 30.05.2026*
_Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy_. *Tasmac Shop Location + Collector’s Duty + Natural Justice + Contempt*. *HJS Admin Law, Law Officer – Excise/Revenue, UPSC GS-2*
*1. Core Holding – One Line*
*Collector can’t delegate inquiry on Tasmac shop objections to DRO. Order opening shop quashed for “absolutely illegal” procedure + false grounds. Fresh inquiry mandated.*
*2. Facts – Perumagalur Tasmac Saga*
**Event** **Detail**
**Initial Proposal** *Tasmac shop in Netaji Nagar, Perumagalur. Public agitation → dropped*
**Fresh Proposal** *Collector orders shop in same street, different location*
**2025 WP** *Petitioner challenges. HC Mar 2026: “Consider objections, decide”*
**Collector Order** *Opens shop citing DM-Tasmac letter: “Alcoholics travel to nearby village → accidents/robberies. Women’s assn wants shop here”*
**Petitioner** *Contempt + WP: “Objections not heard. Order hurried. Reasons false”*
*3. HC Findings – 30.05.2026*
**Issue** **HC Held** **Why Illegal**
**1. Delegation** *Collector deputed DRO to hear objections. Passed order on “oral interaction” with DRO* *Violates natural justice. Collector = statutory authority under TN Liquor Rules. Can’t delegate quasi-judicial function*
**2. False Grounds** *“Robberies happening” – HC: Neither Tasmac nor women’s assn can defame State. No data given* *Order based on unverified, defamatory claim. Non-application of mind*
**3. Objections Ignored** *100m rule checked, but public objections on location, nuisance, women safety not considered* *Mar 2026 HC order directed “consider objections”. Not done*
**4. Indifference** *Collector busy with electoral roll – “shocks conscience”* *Elections no excuse. Statutory duty must be discharged personally*
*Key Quote*: _“The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect… False reasons have been submitted defaming the state and its people.”_
*4. Directions Issued*
1. *Quash Order*: _Permission to open Tasmac shop set aside._
2. *Close Shop*: _Authorities to shut Perumagalur shop immediately._
3. *Fresh Inquiry*: _Collector personally to hear K.S. Ravichandran + others, consider all objections, pass reasoned order._
4. *Contempt*: _Not pressed further since order quashed, but “indifference” noted._
*5. Legal Principles – HJS Notes*
**Principle** **Case Law** **Application Here**
**Delegatus non potest delegare** *A.K. Kraipak 1969* *Collector can’t delegate hearing under TN Liquor (Licence) Rules*
**Natural Justice** *Maneka Gandhi 1978* *Right to personal hearing before authority deciding*
**Speaking Order** *S.N. Mukherjee 1990* *Order must deal with objections, not rely on Tasmac letter alone*
**Wednesbury Unreasonableness** *Tata Cellular 1994* *“Robberies” reason = no evidence = irrational*
*Rule*: _TN Liquor Retail Vending Rules, 2003 – R.8: Collector to decide objections after inquiry. 100m from school/temple is necessary, not sufficient condition._
*6. Impact – For District Admin*
1. *Collectors/SPs*: _Can’t delegate objection hearings in Tasmac, sand quarry, explosive licence. Must hear personally._
2. *Tasmac DM*: _Letters claiming “crime will reduce if shop opens” need FIR data. Vague claims = order quashed._
3. *Public*: _Objectors get personal hearing. “Electoral roll busy” not defence._
4. *Women’s Assn*: _Can’t be used as rubber stamp. HC will verify if assn really exists/requested._
*7. Link to 2026 Docket – “Accountability of Collector”*
**Case** **Officer Pulled Up** **Reason**
**#32 TN Govt Priority** *CS/Dept Secretaries* *File action plan for girl toilets, POCSO courts*
**#33 XXX v DGP** *DGP* *HC: Explain delay, ensure day-to-day trial*
**#38 Undertrial Health** *SP* *48-hr deadline for hospital escort decision*
**#42 Thanjavur Collector** *Collector* *Illegal delegation + false grounds = order quashed*
*2026 Madras HC Theme*: _“Statutory authority = personal responsibility. No delegation, no delay, no defamation of State.”_
*8. For Law Officer/Collector – SOP After #42*
1. *Tasmac Objection*: _Issue notice, fix date, hear objectors yourself. Don’t send DRO/Tahsildar._
2. *Record*: _Proceedings + objections + your finding on each point. Speaking order._
3. *Grounds*: _Verify “crime” claim with SHO crime data. Don’t copy-paste Tasmac letter._
4. *100m Rule*: _Check, but also check nuisance, traffic, women safety, GP resolution._
5. *Election Work*: _Not excuse. If busy, seek HC time, don’t delegate._
*9. Interview Q*
*Q*: _“As Collector, public objects to Tasmac. You’re on election duty. What do you do?”_
*A*: _1. 30.05.26 HC: Can’t delegate. 2. Ask HC for extension citing election, or hear after hours. 3. Hear personally, verify crime data from SP. 4. Pass speaking order dealing with each objection. 5. If reasons false, reject. Delegation = order quashed + contempt risk._
—
*Case #42 Added*: _Thanjavur Collector Tasmac Case – 30.05.26 – No Delegation + False Grounds + Shop Closed_
*Master Docket*: _42 Cases. 2026 = “Child Rights + Speed + Equality + Administrative Accountability”_
*Want*: *1. “Delegation Doctrine – When Collector Can/Can’t Delegate Chart”* OR *2. “Draft Speaking Order Rejecting Tasmac After Hearing – Citing #42”* OR *3. “Natural Justice Violations – 5 Latest HC Cases 2026”*?
