Context: Crime No. 25/2017 DCB Pudukkottai* This is an *8-year-old FIR from 2017*. DCB usually deals with cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, land grabbing cases. Defacto complainant is a woman, so possible matrimonial property/cheating allegations.

*Justice L. Victoria Gowri | Madras HC – Madurai Bench*
*Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 23251 of 2025*
*Petitioner*: Saravanaperumal vs *State of TN & Anandanayaki*

—

*1. Case Details*
– *FIR*: Crime No. 25 of 2017, District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai District
– *Petition filed under*: Section 528 BNSS, 2023 [equivalent to Sec 482 CrPC]
– *Prayer*: To call for records & quash proceedings

*2. Parties*
1. *Petitioner/Accused*: Saravanaperumal
2. *R1*: State – Rep by Inspector of Police, DCB, Pudukkottai
3. *R2*: Defacto Complainant – Anandanayaki

*3. What We Know So Far*
The sekarreporter link shows only the *cause title + prayer*. The full order with facts, allegations, and Justice Gowri’s findings isn’t in the snippet.

*Typical pattern for 528 BNSS/482 CrPC quash petitions before Justice Victoria Gowri on 30.04.2026*:
1. *If allowed*: Court finds FIR discloses no offence, civil dispute, abuse of process → quashed like _Yashmin Nushrath_ case
2. *If dismissed*: Court finds prima facie case, disputed facts of conscious possession, doesn’t fit _Bhajan Lal_ → trial must go on

*4. Context: Crime No. 25/2017 DCB Pudukkottai*
This is an *8-year-old FIR from 2017*. DCB usually deals with cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, land grabbing cases. Defacto complainant is a woman, so possible matrimonial property/cheating allegations.

—

*Bottom Line*: This is another 528 BNSS quash petition before Justice Victoria Gowri, listed with Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos. 20158 & 20160 of 2025. Same bench that delivered multiple quash orders on 30.04.2026.

Want me to pull the *full judgment text* from sekarreporter to see if she allowed or dismissed this one, and her reasoning?