![[12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/yS7vfJITkK0 [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: .☘️☘️ [12/22, 14:56] Sekarreporter1: Reporter malar [12/22, 14:57] Mukesh Puthiyathaimurai Jounalist: 👏👏👍](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [01/04, 10:53] sekarreporter1: MRC Nagar Residents Association in Chennai has filed a public interest litigation petition before the #MadrasHighCourt complaining about heavy road traffic due to Chettinad Vidyashram school, Sun TV Network office and several unauthorised eateries and vendors near the Ayyappan Temple. Chief Justice’s Bench orders notices to the Greater Chennai Corporation and the Commissioner of Police. @THChennai [01/04, 10:53] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Previous story Vinothpandian: 2008 (8) SCC 92 : SBI vs SN goyal : Held Bank survives on the trust of its clientele and constituents , position of manager of bank is a matter of great trust
Recent Posts
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian
More
Recent Posts
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian