Vinothpandian: 2020 (2) CTC 142 : Karuppuraj M vs M ganesan : review not maintainable merely an alternative decision to be taken by court , raising new plea not permissible in review ( order 47 rule 1 CPC 1908 )

[27/02, 10:19] Vinothpandian: 2020 (2) CTC 142 : Karuppuraj M vs M ganesan : review not maintainable merely an alternative decision to be taken by court , raising new plea not permissible in review ( order 47 rule 1 CPC 1908 )
[27/02, 10:19] Vinothpandian: 2017 ( 2) DRTC 630 : Panther fincap & management services ltd vs bank of india : section 25 ( b) RDDBFI act 1993 : Recovery officer recorded findings that though borrower had sufficient means to pay had deliberately avoided to pay debt of bank , wilful disobedience on part of borrowers calls for extreme action like putting them in civil prison by taking recourse to remedies provided under section 25( b) of RDDBFI act 1993
[27/02, 10:19] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) SCC 767 : Ripudaman singh vs balkrishna : cheque issued by purchaser of a property not honoured , disputes cannot be considered in petition under section 482 CRPC , such disputes to be considered only in regular trial
[27/02, 10:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com