Madras High Court in the year 1972 and 2024 taking into consideration the Constitution of India and hereby the decision of restricting
[02/02, 08:25] Sekarreporter: HOMEBHARATWORLDOPERATION SINDOOREDITORIALANALYSISOPINIONCULTUREDEFENCEINTERNATIONAL EDITIONRSS @ 100MAGAZINEREAD ECOPY
Home Bharat
A non-Hindu is not a Hindu: Revisiting the Madras High Court verdict as Char Dham committee restricts Non-Hindus entry
A valid question is, whether the action taken by the Temple Committee of Badrinath-Kedarnath along with others whereby the entry of Non Hindus have been barred in temples in the past is valid and stands on the footing of Constitution of India or not. The question has already been raised and decided by the Madras High Court in the year 1972 and 2024 taking into consideration the Constitution of India and hereby the decision of restricting and prohibiting entries of Non Hindus in the temple is being valid and constitutional in very nature
Adv Amitosh Pareek Feb 1, 2026, 09:30 pm IST
Char Dham commitee restricts entry of non-Hindus into the temples
The Badrinath-Kedarnath Temple Committee asked for a ban on admission of non Hindus. It is pertinent to mention herein that the committee stated that the decision will be imposed on Mukhba, winter residence of Maa Ganga. The Temple committee has stated affirmly that the prohibition against Non Hindus will strongly be enacted. It is quiet evident from the history that whenever an action being taken for the protection of Hindu Dharma and its purity, comments and objections from different ideologies start holding the floor. Jamat Ulema Hind President Arshad Madani remarks came amid declaration by temple committee seeking to enforce long standing religious customs at these reserved shrines. Madani stated “some people thinks country belongs only to them” and claimed that minorities were being unfairly targeted.
Whereas the Vishwa Hind Parishad has welcomes the decision of the Temple committee. By releasing the video International Joint General Secretary Dr. Surendra Jain stated that “not only in these three places but the entry of non hindus should be prohibited at all sacred Hindu pilgrimage sites in India”. By striking and condemning the statement made by Arshad Madini Dr. Surendra Jain has affirmly stated that the venomous and objectionable remark made by Jamat Ulema-e-Hind while opposing the decision is highly reprehensible. He asked will Madini come forward and ask for admission of non Muslims to Mecca and allow Hindus to recite Hanuman Chalisa”.
Other religion barred entry in their places of worship:
It is significant to mention herein that other religions while maintaining their religious ethics barred entry of individuals who do not have faith in their religion to enter in their places of worships such as Christians as well do not permit the tourists to go beyond a certain demarcation cordoned off from the rest of the St. Peter’s at Vatican and at the other orthodox Churches! The Jews also do not permit any Gentiles(non-Jews) or any Reformist Jews to enter their synagogues. Non Muslims are prohibited to enter into and form building places of worship in Mecca and Medina which is being duly protected under International law which extended that every state has a right to implement its own laws to protect its national integrity and security and therefore Saudi Arabia has a law which restricts non-muslims from entering into Mecca and Medina and building places of worship there.
Article 12(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 (ICCPR) restricts the freedom of movement, after mentioned to the right to liberty of movement and freedom, by stating that: “The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant”.
Subject to the restriction of entry of Non Zorastrians in Sanctum Sanctorum of holy Fire temple an PIL has been filed before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the year 2019 sought for a declaration that the prohibition on non Parsi men and wo
[02/02, 08:26] Meta AI: சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் ‘சூப்பர்லா கோர்ட்ஸ்’ என்ற AI கருவியை பயன்படுத்துகிறது. இது வழக்கு ஆவணங்களை துரிதமாக பரிசீலிக்க உதவும். வழக்கு விசாரணை விரைவாக நடக்க உதவும் என எதிர்பார்க்கப்படுகிறது. ¹ ² ³
இந்த AI கருவி ஆவணங்களை ஒழுங்கமைத்து, தேடக்கூடிய உரையாக மாற்றி, முக்கிய தகவல்களை வழங்கும். இது சட்டப்பூர்வ பகுத்தறிவை மாற்றுவதை நோக்கமாகக் கொண்டிருக்கவில்லை, மாறாக வழக்கறிஞர்களுக்கு உதவுவதை நோக்கமாகக் கொண்டுள்ளது.
இந்த தொழில்நுட்பம் நீதிச் செயல்முறையை எவ்வாறு பாதிக்கும் என்பதில் உங்களுக்கு ஆர்வம் உள்ளதா? அல்லது இந்தியாவில் AI மற்றும் சட்டம் பற்றி மேலும் அறிய விரும்புகிறீர்களா?
