You may also like...
Follow:
- Next story சாலைகள், தெருக்களை ஆக்கிரமித்து மத வழிபாட்டுக் கட்டிடங்கள் அமைப்பதை நியாயப்படுத்த முடியாது – உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Previous story [27/01, 13:14] Central Govt Advt Ramasivasanker: In a way it is beneficial to Vijay. He has been granted permission to challenge the order of the Chairperson sending the Film to the review committee. Now due process of Law will be complied with and Film will get CBFC certificate for release [27/01, 13:16] Sekarreporter: 👍 [27/01, 13:16] Central Govt Advt Ramasivasanker: Its my opinion [27/01, 13:16] Sekarreporter: Going sc
Recent Posts
- *Madras High Court upholds tax demand against Vedanta over payments to foreign parent company* The Court dismissed three tax appeals filed by Vedanta and upheld an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-upholds-tax-demand-against-vedanta-over-payments-to-foreign-parent-company
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy heard a petition filed by the girl’s mother seeking permission for termination despite the 24-week limit under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The court said reproductive choice and bodily privacy fall within a woman’s rights and emphasised that if a medical board finds the abortion medically safe, it must be performed at the earliest.
- Madras HC Upholds Rs.700 Crore Income Tax Demand, Dismisses Plea Challenging Assessment Orders Passed During Settlement Commission Dispute
- Home (Courts-VIA) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9 Letter No.9987/Courts-VIA/2026-1, Dated 01.06.2026 From Dr.K.Manivasan, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary to Government. To All District Collectors. Sir/Madam, Sub: Law Officers – Appointment of Law Officers for the subordinate courts in Tamil Nadu on tenure basis Proposals called for – Regarding. Ref: 1. G.O.(Ms).No.4054, Home Department, Dated 18.11.1961. 2. Government letter No. 73194/Courts-VIA/2017-1, dated
- [04/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2062523470039421028 [04/06, 19:15] sekarreporter1: Today, I had the distinct honour of meeting the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Madras High Court along with the elected team of the Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA). This meeting marks a meaningful step forward in strengthening the bond between the Bar and the Bench working together in the interest of justice, the legal fraternity, and the people we serve.
More
Recent Posts
- *Madras High Court upholds tax demand against Vedanta over payments to foreign parent company* The Court dismissed three tax appeals filed by Vedanta and upheld an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-upholds-tax-demand-against-vedanta-over-payments-to-foreign-parent-company
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy heard a petition filed by the girl’s mother seeking permission for termination despite the 24-week limit under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The court said reproductive choice and bodily privacy fall within a woman’s rights and emphasised that if a medical board finds the abortion medically safe, it must be performed at the earliest.
- Madras HC Upholds Rs.700 Crore Income Tax Demand, Dismisses Plea Challenging Assessment Orders Passed During Settlement Commission Dispute
- Home (Courts-VIA) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9 Letter No.9987/Courts-VIA/2026-1, Dated 01.06.2026 From Dr.K.Manivasan, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary to Government. To All District Collectors. Sir/Madam, Sub: Law Officers – Appointment of Law Officers for the subordinate courts in Tamil Nadu on tenure basis Proposals called for – Regarding. Ref: 1. G.O.(Ms).No.4054, Home Department, Dated 18.11.1961. 2. Government letter No. 73194/Courts-VIA/2017-1, dated
- [04/06, 19:14] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2062523470039421028 [04/06, 19:15] sekarreporter1: Today, I had the distinct honour of meeting the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Madras High Court along with the elected team of the Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA). This meeting marks a meaningful step forward in strengthening the bond between the Bar and the Bench working together in the interest of justice, the legal fraternity, and the people we serve.