[06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : ArbOP 266 of 2024 dated 18th dec 2025 : SBI general insurance company vs saravana global energy : Arbitration award challenged under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 , held arbitral tribunal cannot render awards based on equity unless expressly authorised by parties [06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court ( DB) : OSA no 259 of 2024 dated 17th dec 2025 Sri Lakshmi homes pvt ltd vs Pachaiyammal educational trust : Public trust properties cannot be auctioned or sold directly by the court itself , the courts role is limited to supervising the auction process and ensuring fairness compliance with legal procedures and achieving the correct market value for the trust property [06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Uttarakand high court : criminal revision no 927 of 2023 dated 19th dec 2025 : Manoj kumar vs State of uttarakand : In an offence under section 138 NI act part payment plea does not negate offence under section 138 unless lawful adjustment or reduction of cheque liability is established
[06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : ArbOP 266 of 2024 dated 18th dec 2025 : SBI general insurance company vs saravana global energy : Arbitration award challenged under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 , held arbitral tribunal cannot render awards based on equity unless expressly authorised by parties
[06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court ( DB) : OSA no 259 of 2024 dated 17th dec 2025 Sri Lakshmi homes pvt ltd vs Pachaiyammal educational trust : Public trust properties cannot be auctioned or sold directly by the court itself , the courts role is limited to supervising the auction process and ensuring fairness compliance with legal procedures and achieving the correct market value for the trust property
[06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Uttarakand high court : criminal revision no 927 of 2023 dated 19th dec 2025 : Manoj kumar vs State of uttarakand : In an offence under section 138 NI act part payment plea does not negate offence under section 138 unless lawful adjustment or reduction of cheque liability is established
![[09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: https://www.sekarreporter.com/sri-krishna-sweets-trademark-dispute-between-brothers-m-krishnan-and-m-murali-justice-senthilkumar-ramamoorthy-of-madrashighcourt-refuses-to-summon-the-deputy-registrar-of-trademarks-to-tender-evi/ [09/04, 17:52] sekarreporter1: In the ongoing trademark dispute between brothers M. Krishnan and M. Murali (Sri Krishna Sweets) concerning the mark “KRISHNA,” the Madras High Court, presided over by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, declined to summon the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks to tender evidence. Madhan Babu and K. V. Subha appeared as counsel for Mr. Murali, while Sridhar appeared on behalf of Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The present application was filed by the Respondent in the rectification petition instituted by Murali against Sri Krishna Sweets Pvt. Ltd. The dispute centres on the nature of the trademark “KRISHNA,” specifically whether it constitutes a word mark or a device mark. The applicant had sought to summon the Deputy Registrar under Section 138 of the Trade Marks Act to clarify alleged discrepancies in the “legal use certificate” issued by the Registry. The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by summoning the Deputy Registrar and observed that the parties are at liberty to advance their respective arguments on the classification of the mark at the stage of final hearing. Matter posted to 29.04.26](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)