Follow:
- Next story [06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : ArbOP 266 of 2024 dated 18th dec 2025 : SBI general insurance company vs saravana global energy : Arbitration award challenged under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 , held arbitral tribunal cannot render awards based on equity unless expressly authorised by parties [06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court ( DB) : OSA no 259 of 2024 dated 17th dec 2025 Sri Lakshmi homes pvt ltd vs Pachaiyammal educational trust : Public trust properties cannot be auctioned or sold directly by the court itself , the courts role is limited to supervising the auction process and ensuring fairness compliance with legal procedures and achieving the correct market value for the trust property [06/01, 10:53] Vinothpandian: Uttarakand high court : criminal revision no 927 of 2023 dated 19th dec 2025 : Manoj kumar vs State of uttarakand : In an offence under section 138 NI act part payment plea does not negate offence under section 138 unless lawful adjustment or reduction of cheque liability is established
- Previous story வேலியே பயிரை மேய்கிறது HRNC case
Recent Posts
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
- Lawyer cannot recover disputed legal fees from client by filing writ petition: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/lawyer-cannot-recover-disputed-legal-fees-from-client-by-filing-writ-petition-madras-high-court
More
Recent Posts
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
- Lawyer cannot recover disputed legal fees from client by filing writ petition: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/lawyer-cannot-recover-disputed-legal-fees-from-client-by-filing-writ-petition-madras-high-court