Follow:
- Next story Setaside /HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Crl.A. (MD) No.738 of 2022 Muthukaleeswaran Appellant/A2 Vs. The Inspector of Police
- Previous story Justices R Suresh Kumar & S Sounthar of #MadrasHighCourt grant one more month’s time for the State Government to constitute the Tamil Nadu Heritage Commission. Say, it’s important to constitute the commission at the earliest. @THChennai Backgrounder👇
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira of #MadrasHighCourt has directed Tamil Nadu government to pay a compensation of ₹10 lakh each to three minor boys who were subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by none other than their fathers over a long period of time. Impressing upon the need for trial courts to order compensation in such incestuous abuse cases since
- sekarreporter1: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/markets-news/Tipranks/2345278/beardsell-wins-appeal-battle-to-protect-core-trademark-in-madras-high-court/ [08/06, 11:16] sekarreporter1: Home Canada Business Investing
- The Madras High Court held that the impugned order imposing General Penalty under Section 125 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could not be sustained in law because the default alleged against the petitioner, namely delayed filing of Annual Returns for FY 2020-21, was already specifically dealt with by Section 47 of the GST enactments, which prescribes Late Fee for such
- First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan directed the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer to respond to the contempt plea by July 2, 2026. They, however, dispensed with his personal appearance before the court for now.
- Counsel for Appellants: Mr. R. Palaniandavan Counsel for Respondents: Mr.Perumpulavil Radhakrishnan, Mr.P.T.Perumal Case Title: Sun TV Network Limited v R Sukanya and Others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 Case No: AS No. 971 of 2015
More
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira of #MadrasHighCourt has directed Tamil Nadu government to pay a compensation of ₹10 lakh each to three minor boys who were subjected to aggravated penetrative sexual assault by none other than their fathers over a long period of time. Impressing upon the need for trial courts to order compensation in such incestuous abuse cases since
- sekarreporter1: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/markets-news/Tipranks/2345278/beardsell-wins-appeal-battle-to-protect-core-trademark-in-madras-high-court/ [08/06, 11:16] sekarreporter1: Home Canada Business Investing
- The Madras High Court held that the impugned order imposing General Penalty under Section 125 of the TNGST Act, 2017 could not be sustained in law because the default alleged against the petitioner, namely delayed filing of Annual Returns for FY 2020-21, was already specifically dealt with by Section 47 of the GST enactments, which prescribes Late Fee for such
- First Division Bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan directed the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer to respond to the contempt plea by July 2, 2026. They, however, dispensed with his personal appearance before the court for now.
- Counsel for Appellants: Mr. R. Palaniandavan Counsel for Respondents: Mr.Perumpulavil Radhakrishnan, Mr.P.T.Perumal Case Title: Sun TV Network Limited v R Sukanya and Others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 244 Case No: AS No. 971 of 2015