#RTE: Madras HC dismisses PIL seeking to stay readmissions made by Pvt schools of students already admitted through normal category under RTE quota without keeping 25% of the seats vacant as mandated under the law. Aag Ravinthiren argued for state chief bench dismissed

You may also like...

• 

  The Supreme Court has observed that office-bearers of the Bar Association arre to be elected by genuine voters and advocates genuinely/regularly practising in the High Court/Court concerned.

  September 28, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 28, 2021

• 

  Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. In continuation of our earlier order dated 18.06.2021, we pass the following order: 2 Mr. N. Vijayaraghavan, learned Amicus Curiae and Mr.S.Sethuraman and Mr. M. Ilayaraja, Assistant Chief Nodal Officers are present. Further, except Mr. V. John Mino, Sessions Judge, Dindigul, who was appointed as the District Nodal Officer for Dindigul, the remaining 33 District Nodal Officers appointed vide our earlier order dated 18.06.2021, participated in the hearing via Video Conferencing and stated that they have received the 3-member Sub Judge Committee report and the report of the High Court Inspection Team and that they have taken print outs of the same and made them as booklets. They further stated that they have appointed the required number of Assistant Nodal Officers in their respective districts. 3 Mr. R. Joseph Joy, Family Judge, Kanyakumari, stated that he is, at present, holding additional charge of three Courts, viz., the Special Court under the POCSO Act, the Mahila Court and the Additional District Court, Padmanabhapuram and therefore, he requested that he may be permitted to have the assistance of a Judicial Officer of the rank of a Sub Judge.

  July 6, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 6, 2021

• 

  SC stays HC order on plea seeking CBI probe in rk nagar by poll bribery caseSenior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi argued the appeal preferred by the MLA challenging the High Court order, Advocate General Vijay Narayan and Additional Advocate General Balaji Srinivasan appeared on behalf of the Inspector of Police. The appellants contended that a Division Bench of the High Court had failed to appreciate that the FIR registered at the instance of the ECI had got quashed by a single judge of the same High Court in March 2018.

  March 10, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 10, 2020