You may also like...
-
The Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with the finding of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court regarding the deemed demand concession withdrawal by TNERC since 2013. The batch of Special Leave Petitions filed by the HT Open Access Consumers challenged the Division Bench order of the Hon’ble Madras High Court, which upheld the circular issued by TANGEDCO authorising the issuance of demand notices in accordance with the Tariff Order dated 10.06.2013 issued by TNERC, which did not consider a deemed demand.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 10, 2026
-
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)NO.13555 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)NO.1 OF 2009 J.Sharmila .. Petitioner vs27.In the present case, it is suffice to state that if the intention of the State Government is to afford protection of the woman for her second delivery, then it should not be based upon the number of children she delivers during those two deliveries. The importance has to be seen only from the health point of the woman Government servant and not the number of children one delivers during each delivery. Hence this court is not inclined to accept the reasons found in the impugned order based upon the so-called Explanation 1 to Rule 101(a) of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner who had availed maternity leave for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.1.2007 during her second pregnancy, is entitled to be paid full salary for that period. 28.In the light of the above, the writ petition will stand allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. The respondents are directed to pay full salary to the petitioner for the maternity leave availed by her for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.01.2007 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 3, 2020