You may also like...
-
-
Considering the above facts and circumstances, the relief as such sought for in this writ petition cannot be granted and the writ petition is dismissed with the cost of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) payable by the petitioner to the sixth respondent – Inspector of Police, Abiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.04.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.5483 of 2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 18, 2022
-
Justice PT Asha noted that there were limits to how far a Court can interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it comes to modifying an arbitral award. In this regard, she cited a 2019 Madras High Court ruling in the case of SG Novasoft Technologies Limited v. Gayathri Balusamy, wherein it was held, “A reasonable interpretation to Section 34 would only lead to an irresistible conclusion that the Court can modify or vary the Award of the Arbitrator if it is contrary to the material evidence adduced by the parties.”
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 26, 2020