[9/5, 14:55] Sekarreporter: [9/5, 14:54] Basker Mba Secretry: My senior Shri R. Gandhi’s 84th birthday today.
![[6/18, 17:04] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1273579829632184320?s=08 [6/18, 17:07] Sekarreporter 1: The Writ petition filed by DMK for directions to TN government and Central government to give consent for landing of *foreign rescue vande bharath mission flights* in Tamilnadu and to provide more flights and rescue the stranded Indians struck in foreign countries is directed by Division Bench comprising Justice R Subbiah and Justice Krishnan Ramasamy to be posted on 19.6.2020 for hearing after accepting Mr P. Wilson Senior Advocate mentioning today for listing of the matter.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Mr Shangar Murali Advocate [9/5, 18:28] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Section 11 of CPC. A defendant would successfully contest a suit filed by a plaintiff on the plea, of “Ex Capito Resjudicata” (One suit and one decision is enough for any single dispute).
- Previous story Labour case full order of MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.389 and 403 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.459, 463, 476, 478 & 481 of 2021 1.Co-op Sugar Mills Anna Thozhilalar Sangam Represented by its President P.Arul Mozhi— In view of what is stated herein-above, these Writ Petitions are ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 15. This Court places on record its deep appreciation to the submissions made by Mrs.N.Mala, learned Government Pleader (Puducherry) and Ms.Lakshmi Swaroopa, learned counsel for the petitioners, who effectively assisted this Court for disposal of these Writ Petitions. —For Petitioners : Ms.L.Lakshmi Swaroopa (in both W.P.’s) For Respondents : Ms.L.Usha (R1, R2 and R4) (in both W.P.’s) Additional Government Pleader (Pondy) Mr.M.Nirmal Kumar (R3)
Recent Posts
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
More
Recent Posts
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant