![*Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* [Not Available] – *Judge:* P.VELMURUGAN, J. and JOTHIRAMAN, J. – *Parties:* – Petitioner: Mother of the Victim – Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* [Not Available] – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: [Not Available] – For Respondent: A.DHAMODHARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu Government to pay an interim compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs to the victim of a sexual assault case in Anna Nagar, Chennai, noting that Rs. 1 lakh had already been paid. The investigation is complete, charge sheet filed, and trial is to commence soon.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The Supreme Court observed that it cannot appreciate why a person who was not arrested during investigation, on charge sheet being filed, be sent to custody when he appears on receipt of summons?
- Previous story release of the amount of 2 crore deposited by Congress MP Karti Chidambaram. He had made the deposit based on a court direction as a condition to travel abroad.
Recent Posts
- the Criminal Revision Petitions stand dismissed and the impugned order passed by the learned II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai, in Crl.MP.No.252 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.2 of 2026 in C.C.No.7 of 2025 dated 23.03.2026, is hereby confirmed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [N.A.V.,J.] & [K.K.R.K.,J.]
- Karur Stampede] Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for respondent side : This court directed CBI probe. Now some accused who are now ministers in present regime are attempting to influence the witnesses. We have filed an application Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah: We will have it tomorrow
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench adjourns by three weeks a 2025 plea by former DMK Minister V. Senthilbalaji’s brother R.V. Ashok Kumar to quash a Look Out Circular issued against him at the instance of the Enforcement Directorate @THChennai
- PIL not for private grievance or to avenge any individual”_ *2. Madras HC Observation* *Court Said*:
- C saravanan judge this writ petition is liable to be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the petitioner desires so. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
More
Recent Posts
- the Criminal Revision Petitions stand dismissed and the impugned order passed by the learned II Additional District Judge (CBI Cases), Madurai, in Crl.MP.No.252 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.2 of 2026 in C.C.No.7 of 2025 dated 23.03.2026, is hereby confirmed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [N.A.V.,J.] & [K.K.R.K.,J.]
- Karur Stampede] Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for respondent side : This court directed CBI probe. Now some accused who are now ministers in present regime are attempting to influence the witnesses. We have filed an application Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah: We will have it tomorrow
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench adjourns by three weeks a 2025 plea by former DMK Minister V. Senthilbalaji’s brother R.V. Ashok Kumar to quash a Look Out Circular issued against him at the instance of the Enforcement Directorate @THChennai
- PIL not for private grievance or to avenge any individual”_ *2. Madras HC Observation* *Court Said*:
- C saravanan judge this writ petition is liable to be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the petitioner desires so. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.