Senior advt R viduthalai interview

You may also like...

• 

  Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN                                         W.P.No. 17091 of 2004 The Managing Director      M/s.Tata Tea Ltd.,- In the light of the aforesaid legislative process, if the present case is tested, it can be easily understood that the word ‘establishment’ has not been defined under the Act, 1972 and what is not specifically mentioned in the enactment cannot be borrowed or legislatively incorporated in the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act to give a special meaning to ‘plantation’ and extend powers to the Central Government to inspect the plantation. Finding much force in the contention of the petitioners, this Court is of the view that the impugned notification has no legs to stand and the same is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed. It is needless to state here that this order will not preclude the State Government Authorities VAIDYANATHAN, J. –

  August 14, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 14, 2021

• 

  The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA)under the visionary leadership of Hon’ble Chief Justice of India and the Patron-in-Chief, NALSA Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon’ble Executive Chairman Hon’bleMr. Justice U.U. Lalit conceptualized a pan-India Awareness and Outreach Campaign

  October 18, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 18, 2021

• 

  Case against maridoss Quashed full order of. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.OP(MD)No.20774 of 2021 and CRL.MP(MD)Nos.11863 & 11864 of 2021 Maridhas            … Petitioner / Sole Accused vs. For Petitioner   : Mr.Anantha Padmanabhan,   for Mr.M.Karthikeyavenkatachalapathy. For Respondent  : Ms.P.Malini.

  February 10, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2022