Follow:
- Next story 2/2, 13:19] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1356509941670940678?s=08 [2/2, 13:19] Sekarreporter1: [2/2, 13:18] Sekarreporter1: The I.A. filed by Sivabalamurugam AOR seeking stay of 69 percentage reservation in State of Tamilnadu was listed before Honble justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Reddy
- Previous story Dmk mps complaint in election comission delhi
Recent Posts
- கருணையும் நிதியும் ஒன்றாய் சேர்ந்தவர் தலைவர் கலைஞர்!! அவரை நன்றியோடு வணங்குகிறேன். தளபதி அவர் கள் வழியில் நடப்போம். கழகம் காப்போம். தமிழ்நாடு காப்போம். வணக்கம் வெ.இரவி தி.மு.க. சொத்து பாதுகாப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் பிரிவு தலைவர்
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).No.1067 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.828 of 2026 Prince Vino, President, Marthandam Educational & Charitable Trust, Marthandam College of Engineering, Kittu Kuzhiviyyanur post, Kanyakumari district. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Inspector General of Registration, Office of Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028, Tamil Nadu. 2. The District Registrar, Marthandam Registration District, Integrated Complex,
- Order setaside HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)Nos.3011 of 2026 and 31834 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25026, 25029 and 27598 of 2025 In W.P.(MD).No.3011 of 2026 :- S.Lilavathi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Sub-Registrar, Papanasam – 614 205.
- 02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2018 (4) crimes SC 232 : Reema Salkan vs sumer Singh Salkan : A well qualified and able bodied man cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain his wife merely on a plea of not possessing any source of income [02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes SC 169 : Ghusabhai Raisanghai chorasiya vs state of gujarat : Allegation of illicit
- [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: The appeals preferred by the two investors against the order of the learned Single Judge, which had paved the way for the release of actor Chiyaan Vikram starrer Dhruva Natchathiram or before 15.06.2026, were extensively argued over a period of two days. Senior Counsels Mr. S.R. Rajagopal and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared for the Appellants, while Senior Counsels Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed represented the Respondents. Earlier on 21.05.2026, pending further consideration of the matter, the Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to direct the learned Advocate Commissioners not to disburse the sum of Rs.10.62 crores without obtaining the leave of the Court , the Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Velmurugan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi of the Madras High Court reserved orders in the appeals.
More
Recent Posts
- கருணையும் நிதியும் ஒன்றாய் சேர்ந்தவர் தலைவர் கலைஞர்!! அவரை நன்றியோடு வணங்குகிறேன். தளபதி அவர் கள் வழியில் நடப்போம். கழகம் காப்போம். தமிழ்நாடு காப்போம். வணக்கம் வெ.இரவி தி.மு.க. சொத்து பாதுகாப்பு வழக்கறிஞர் பிரிவு தலைவர்
- THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).No.1067 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD).No.828 of 2026 Prince Vino, President, Marthandam Educational & Charitable Trust, Marthandam College of Engineering, Kittu Kuzhiviyyanur post, Kanyakumari district. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Inspector General of Registration, Office of Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028, Tamil Nadu. 2. The District Registrar, Marthandam Registration District, Integrated Complex,
- Order setaside HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)Nos.3011 of 2026 and 31834 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.25026, 25029 and 27598 of 2025 In W.P.(MD).No.3011 of 2026 :- S.Lilavathi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Sub-Registrar, Papanasam – 614 205.
- 02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2018 (4) crimes SC 232 : Reema Salkan vs sumer Singh Salkan : A well qualified and able bodied man cannot be absolved of his liability to maintain his wife merely on a plea of not possessing any source of income [02/06, 11:27] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes SC 169 : Ghusabhai Raisanghai chorasiya vs state of gujarat : Allegation of illicit
- [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [02/06, 12:47] sekarreporter1: The appeals preferred by the two investors against the order of the learned Single Judge, which had paved the way for the release of actor Chiyaan Vikram starrer Dhruva Natchathiram or before 15.06.2026, were extensively argued over a period of two days. Senior Counsels Mr. S.R. Rajagopal and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared for the Appellants, while Senior Counsels Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed represented the Respondents. Earlier on 21.05.2026, pending further consideration of the matter, the Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to direct the learned Advocate Commissioners not to disburse the sum of Rs.10.62 crores without obtaining the leave of the Court , the Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Velmurugan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi of the Madras High Court reserved orders in the appeals.