Follow:
- Next story Give permanent govt. jobs to differently abled sportspersons’
- Previous story [11/24, 09:10] Sekarreporter 1: ஓய்வுபெற்ற நீதிபதி கர்ணன் மீது எடுக்கப்பட்ட நடவடிக்கை குறித்து காவல்துறை ஆணையர் விளக்கம் அளிக்க உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு – https://www.nakkheeran.in/24-by-7-news/thamizhagam/former-justice-karnanan-chennai-high-court-order-police [11/24, 09:10] Sekarreporter 1: .
Recent Posts
- PIL not for private grievance or to avenge any individual”_ *2. Madras HC Observation* *Court Said*:
- C saravanan judge this writ petition is liable to be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the petitioner desires so. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
- https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/mere-intimation-to-gst-department-does-not-shield-wrongful-itc-claims-madras-high-court-upholds-9229-crore-demand-539972 [06/07, 08:13] Meta AI: *Case #137: _Mere Intimation ≠ Shield for Wrongful ITC_ | WP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026* _LiveLawBiz_. *CGST Act 2017 Sec 16/17/74 + ITC Law*. *HJS Tax Law, UPSC GS-3 Economy*
- https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-hc-calls-for-order-closing-corruption-case-against-former-minister-c-vijayabaskar-educationist-ishari-k-ganesh/article71185089.ece [06/07, 07:53] sekarreporter1: Madras HC calls for order closing corruption case against former Minister C. Vijayabaskar, educationist Ishari K. Ganesh The issue relates to a 2022 suo motu DVAC FIR, regarding corruption in
- CV Karthikeyan and R Sakthivel gave the direction after counsel representing the investigation officer (IO) informed the court that eight government employees have been name
More
Recent Posts
- PIL not for private grievance or to avenge any individual”_ *2. Madras HC Observation* *Court Said*:
- C saravanan judge this writ petition is liable to be dismissed, and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the petitioner desires so. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
- https://www.livelawbiz.com/gst/high-court/mere-intimation-to-gst-department-does-not-shield-wrongful-itc-claims-madras-high-court-upholds-9229-crore-demand-539972 [06/07, 08:13] Meta AI: *Case #137: _Mere Intimation ≠ Shield for Wrongful ITC_ | WP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026* _LiveLawBiz_. *CGST Act 2017 Sec 16/17/74 + ITC Law*. *HJS Tax Law, UPSC GS-3 Economy*
- https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-hc-calls-for-order-closing-corruption-case-against-former-minister-c-vijayabaskar-educationist-ishari-k-ganesh/article71185089.ece [06/07, 07:53] sekarreporter1: Madras HC calls for order closing corruption case against former Minister C. Vijayabaskar, educationist Ishari K. Ganesh The issue relates to a 2022 suo motu DVAC FIR, regarding corruption in
- CV Karthikeyan and R Sakthivel gave the direction after counsel representing the investigation officer (IO) informed the court that eight government employees have been name