Follow:
- Next story 11/11, 08:01] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.taxscan.in/thanthi-trust-is-eligible-for-exemption-under-section-12a-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-madras-high-court/82811/ [11/11, 08:01] Sekarreporter 1: Logo HEADLINES World Accountants Day: ICAI Launches Global Management Development Program Bombay HC refuses to grant Bail to MD of IL&FS Transportation Networks accused of Money Laundering to the tune of INR 27.78 Crores judges t sivananam and bavani subrayan j
- Previous story IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.11.2020 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.A.Nos.1039 & 3216 of 2019 . The order passed by the learned single Judge dated 23.07.2019 in W.P.No.1262 of 2019 is contrary to the order dated 29.04.2019 passed by the Division Bench and facts and therefore, it is deemed to be set aside. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. For reporting compliance, call the matter on 20.11.2020. (N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 10.11.2020
Recent Posts
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
More
Recent Posts
- Madras High Court Issues Statewide Directions For Timely Disposal Of SARFAESI Pleas Seeking Aid In Taking Possession Kirit Singhania 6 June 2026 11:08 AM (8 mins read ) Share this The Madras High Court on Friday issued a comprehensive set of statewide directions governing applications under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court observed that delays by designated authorities defeat
- Appavu case advt A.Saravanan interview
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media