![[6/10, 16:05] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1402937408719519744?s=1006 [6/10, 16:05] Sekarreporter1: சிறை விதிகளின் படி 3 ஆண்டுகள் சிறையில் இருந்தால் கைதிகள் பரோல் விடுப்பு கோர முடியும்.இவ்வாறு பரோல் வழங்கும் போது கைதிகளின் தண்டனை பெற்ற காலத்தில் இருந்து கணக்கிடாமல் அவர்கள் விசாரணைகாக சிறையில் இருந்த காலத்தையும் கணக்கில் கொள்ள வேண்டும் – சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN W.P.No.8284 of 2020In the conspectus of the above discussion and narrative, this Court has no hesitation in allowing the Writ Petition. The impugned order of the fourth respondent in Na.ka.No.A3/02600/2020 dated 09.04.2020 is hereby set aside and the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for his appointment to the post of Grade-II Police Constable, Jail Warder and Fireman in the appropriate post as per his rank and eligibility without reference to the involvement of the petitioner in the criminal case as indicated in the impugned proceedings, if he is otherwise fit in all other respects. The authorities are directed to pass appropriate orders in compliance with the above direction within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- Previous story Speaking to TNIE, senior advocate Geetha Ramaseshan calls this an important judgment. “Justice (retd) Prabha Sridevan had delivered a similar judgement before,” she says. The judgement had stated that the economic value of the unpaid domestic work of women should be taken into account under the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) treaty which India ratified in July 1993.
Recent Posts
- Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu and the Registrar General, Madras High Court are expected to issue a comprehensive circular in this regard. With the above observations and directions, this criminal appeal stands disposed of. Internet : Yes 09.07.2025 gk Note: Mark a copy of this order to 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Registrar General, Madras High Court. To 1.The Inspector of Police, NIB CID, Trichy District. 2.The Judge, Additional District Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk Crl.A(MD)No.192 of 2024 09.07.2025
- [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1943880595790041502?t=4TVOgRzwnpEuIkj8DlAj3g&s=08 [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: Advocate & IP Attorney P.Sanjai Gamdhi @ Trade mark speak at saveetha law school on today
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
More
Recent Posts
- Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu and the Registrar General, Madras High Court are expected to issue a comprehensive circular in this regard. With the above observations and directions, this criminal appeal stands disposed of. Internet : Yes 09.07.2025 gk Note: Mark a copy of this order to 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Registrar General, Madras High Court. To 1.The Inspector of Police, NIB CID, Trichy District. 2.The Judge, Additional District Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk Crl.A(MD)No.192 of 2024 09.07.2025
- [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1943880595790041502?t=4TVOgRzwnpEuIkj8DlAj3g&s=08 [12/07, 09:20] Sekarreporter: Advocate & IP Attorney P.Sanjai Gamdhi @ Trade mark speak at saveetha law school on today
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
