[9/2, 10:04] Sekarreporter: Mhc madurai hc new EB advocates appointed [9/2, 10:04] Sekarreporter: ..🙏🙏💐
[9/2, 10:04] Sekarreporter: Mhc madurai hc new EB advocates appointed
[9/2, 10:04] Sekarreporter: ..🙏🙏💐
![BREAKING] Lawyers can’t be summoned over advice to clients unless exceptional circumstances exist: Supreme Court](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [9/2, 10:12] Sekarreporter: Good morning, Sir. I’m Adv. Meghna Kumar from the office of the Plaintiff Counsel in the below matter. This is to bring the following contents to your kind attention and for circulation. *Judgment in the matter of Pulavar Keeran* – Item 1 dated 01.09.2021 before RSMJ The Lt. Pulavar Keeran, one of the greatest orators of Tamil Nadu, had given various discourses on Mahabharata, Ramayan, etc. His discourses were recorded by Vani Recording Company, and the said recording company exploited the works of Lt. Pulavar Keeran without any contract / agreement with Mr. Keeran or his family. The wife of Lt. Keeran had filed a Suit before the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the year 2004 seeking for a declaration that she is the owner of the copyright of all the works of the Lt. Pulavar Keeran. Yesterday (01.09.2021), after 17 years, Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Subramanian of the Hon’ble Mad HC delivered the Judgment in this Suit holding that Sellapapa Keeran ie, wife of Lt. Pulavar. Keeran is the owner of the copyrights for the works of Lt. Pulavar Keeran. [9/2, 10:12] Sekarreporter: 💐
- Previous story தேமுதிக பொருளாளர் பிரேமலதா துபாய் செல்ல பாஸ்போர்ட்டை வழங்குமாறு , மண்டல பாஸ்போர்ட் அதிகாரிக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது ..
Recent Posts
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
- அதிமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ஆர்.பி.உதயகுமாரின் சொத்து மதிப்பு குறைந்திருந்தாலும், மனைவி பெயருக்கு சொத்துக்களை மாற்றியதை மறைத்தது குறித்து வருமான வரித்துறை விசாரணை நடத்தி அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய உத்தரவிடக்
- IT Park Constructed For Monthly Rental Is Not A ‘Real Estate Project’ Under RERA; Tenant Under Monthly Lease Is Not An ‘Allottee’: Madras High Court The Court held that RERA Registration is mandated only when a project is developed with an intention to sell and not when the developer retains the ownership and merely leases out the property on a monthly basis. CASE DETAILS Case Title Delphina Consultants LLP v. The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority & Ors. Case No. WP No. 13561 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 13 March 2026 Result Petition Allowed; TNRERA Order Set Aside
- Kalaimagal saba AT MADRAS DATED: 10.04.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.A.No.472 of 2024 and CMP.Nos.10972, 28866, 10981, 10983, 10986, 25071, 25107, 25111, 25119, 28863, 30475 & 30593 of 2025
More
Recent Posts
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
- அதிமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ஆர்.பி.உதயகுமாரின் சொத்து மதிப்பு குறைந்திருந்தாலும், மனைவி பெயருக்கு சொத்துக்களை மாற்றியதை மறைத்தது குறித்து வருமான வரித்துறை விசாரணை நடத்தி அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய உத்தரவிடக்
- IT Park Constructed For Monthly Rental Is Not A ‘Real Estate Project’ Under RERA; Tenant Under Monthly Lease Is Not An ‘Allottee’: Madras High Court The Court held that RERA Registration is mandated only when a project is developed with an intention to sell and not when the developer retains the ownership and merely leases out the property on a monthly basis. CASE DETAILS Case Title Delphina Consultants LLP v. The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority & Ors. Case No. WP No. 13561 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 13 March 2026 Result Petition Allowed; TNRERA Order Set Aside
- Kalaimagal saba AT MADRAS DATED: 10.04.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.A.No.472 of 2024 and CMP.Nos.10972, 28866, 10981, 10983, 10986, 25071, 25107, 25111, 25119, 28863, 30475 & 30593 of 2025