Follow:
- Next story Advocate General P.H. Arvindh Pandian stated that only a rational approach, common to all, had been adopted. The court was also told that a lockdown to fight COVID-19 was never contemplated and as such there was no exact provision in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code of 2004 to apply to the present situation. Therefore, the method followed by Tangedco could not be termed as irrational or violative of any provision, it asserted.
- Previous story [6/22, 21:43] Sekarreporter 1: Yes sir [6/22, 21:43] Sekarreporter 1: New Gp name [6/22, 21:43] Sekarreporter 1: Pondicherry GP changed , is it true sr I heard that one lady appointed as GP by LG [6/22, 21:43] Sekarreporter 1: R.Mala [6/22, 21:43] Sekarreporter 1: Photo [6/22, 21:44] Sekarreporter 1: Mala photo please send
Recent Posts
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs a host of Internet Service Providers to block websites which exhibit Sunny Deol starrer #Border2 without authorisation. Passes the orders in a case filed by
- The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld a Family Court’s decision whereby custody of a 7-year old child (respondent 2) from his biological mother (respondent 1) was refused to be transferred to the appellant—father on the grounds that he kept a second
- Madras hc news
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar
More
Recent Posts
- Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs a host of Internet Service Providers to block websites which exhibit Sunny Deol starrer #Border2 without authorisation. Passes the orders in a case filed by
- The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld a Family Court’s decision whereby custody of a 7-year old child (respondent 2) from his biological mother (respondent 1) was refused to be transferred to the appellant—father on the grounds that he kept a second
- Madras hc news
- CJ Bench 8 WA/175/2026 (Forest) THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND VS SRI KANCHI KAMAKOTI PEETHAM AND 4 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- No mudslinging against judges’: Madras HC pulls up lawyer in Savukku Shankar case During the bail proceedings, Shankar’s counsel alleged that the judge had exhibited bias by referring to Shankar