Follow:
- Next story The Chennai Bench of Custom, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) recently set aside the confiscation made by the Commissioner of Custom Sea on the ground that the jewellery imported was not prohibited, even if the permissible limit for importation of jewellery has been exceeded, it is unlawful to deny the option to redeem goods on payment of fine after confiscation.
- Previous story In absence of ‘intent to conceal’ cannot be construed as smuggled: CESTAT CESTAT directs Customs Authorities to return confiscated gold to Foreign National- lack of evidence and flimsy investigation by the authorities. Held that in the absence of ‘intent to conceal’ cannot be construed as smuggled. Subscribe to updates Ahamed Gani Natchiar Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) Appearances For Appellant: Ms. Shabnam Banu- Appearances For Respondent: Department Representative- Joint Commissioner CESTAT directs Customs Authorities to return confiscated gold to Foreign National- lack of evidence and flimsy investigation by the authorities. Held that in the absence of ‘intent to conceal’ cannot be construed as smuggled. This appeal arose before The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) challenging on the absolute confiscation of 626 grams of gold jewellery that belonged to the Appellant, a resident
Recent Posts
- Case Filed Against ADMK for Distributing ‘Cheque-like’ Pamphlets of ₹2,000, ₹10,000 – Madras HC* *Petitioner*: Advocate Sundara Vadivel, Perungudi, Chennai *Filed in*: Madras High Court *Issue*: Alleged corrupt practice during 2026 Assembly election campaign
- Cases Against Former ADMK Ministers – PMLA Plea in Madras HC* *Petitioner*: R. Girirajan, DMK Rajya Sabha MP *Hearing*: Listed for Monday *Bench*: Chief Justice S.A. Dharmadhikari, Justice G. Arulmurugan
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
- அதிமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ஆர்.பி.உதயகுமாரின் சொத்து மதிப்பு குறைந்திருந்தாலும், மனைவி பெயருக்கு சொத்துக்களை மாற்றியதை மறைத்தது குறித்து வருமான வரித்துறை விசாரணை நடத்தி அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய உத்தரவிடக்
More
Recent Posts
- Case Filed Against ADMK for Distributing ‘Cheque-like’ Pamphlets of ₹2,000, ₹10,000 – Madras HC* *Petitioner*: Advocate Sundara Vadivel, Perungudi, Chennai *Filed in*: Madras High Court *Issue*: Alleged corrupt practice during 2026 Assembly election campaign
- Cases Against Former ADMK Ministers – PMLA Plea in Madras HC* *Petitioner*: R. Girirajan, DMK Rajya Sabha MP *Hearing*: Listed for Monday *Bench*: Chief Justice S.A. Dharmadhikari, Justice G. Arulmurugan
- Judge Baratha chakraverthy / the deceased Murugan’s old mother. The process of law for registration of documents and the writ jurisdiction cannot be abused to grab property and defeat the rights of others. This purchaser making this kind of purchase is simply shocking the conscience of the Court.
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP,
- அதிமுக முன்னாள் அமைச்சர் ஆர்.பி.உதயகுமாரின் சொத்து மதிப்பு குறைந்திருந்தாலும், மனைவி பெயருக்கு சொத்துக்களை மாற்றியதை மறைத்தது குறித்து வருமான வரித்துறை விசாரணை நடத்தி அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய உத்தரவிடக்