You may also like...
-
-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.(MD)NO.13555 of 2009 and M.P.(MD)NO.1 OF 2009 J.Sharmila .. Petitioner vs27.In the present case, it is suffice to state that if the intention of the State Government is to afford protection of the woman for her second delivery, then it should not be based upon the number of children she delivers during those two deliveries. The importance has to be seen only from the health point of the woman Government servant and not the number of children one delivers during each delivery. Hence this court is not inclined to accept the reasons found in the impugned order based upon the so-called Explanation 1 to Rule 101(a) of the Fundamental Rules. The petitioner who had availed maternity leave for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.1.2007 during her second pregnancy, is entitled to be paid full salary for that period. 28.In the light of the above, the writ petition will stand allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. The respondents are directed to pay full salary to the petitioner for the maternity leave availed by her for the period from 16.10.2006 to 11.01.2007 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 3, 2020
-
https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1680205011903729664?t=S9Wn8uuyuO7DNfAt5mc9Yg&s=08 நண்பனை வைத்து விழா காணும் நம்ம நீதிபதி உண்மை நண்பர்கள் இரு நீதிபதிகள் இந்த காலத்தில் கூட இப்படியும் உள்ளார்களா ? கர்ண்னை போல நண்பனை மறாவா நீதிபதி ரவிசந்திரபாபு வாழ்க பல்லாண்டு வாழ்க வளமுடன்
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 15, 2023