Follow:
- Next story [3/20, 09:59] Sekarreporter 1: Madurai: Plea against opening Tasmac outlet – http://toi.in/nI7C9Z/a31gj Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare [3/20, 10:00] Sekarreporter 1: bench of justices P N Prakash and B Pugalendhi disposed of the petition by directing the authorities concerned to consider the petitioner’s representation and pass appropriate orders.
- Previous story Marina case full order DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J. AND R.SURESH KUMAR, J. (Order of the Court was made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Heard learned Additional Advocate General Mr.S.R.Rajagopal about the applications to be received for allotment of carts at Marina Beach. Learned Additional Advocate General prayed for some more time to take clear instructions and place on record the eligibility of the applicants in Category A’ (540 at the rate of 60% of 900 carts) and Category ‘B’ (remaining 40% of 900 ie., 360 carts).
Recent Posts
- The Supreme Court today(October 31) allowed an intervention filed by the Criminal Justice and Police Accountability Project, arguing that the State of Madhya Pradesh has violated the 2024 Sukanya Shantha judgment through its Madhya Pradesh Sudharatmak Sevayen Evam Bandigrah Adhiniyam, 2024, in the suo moto matter concerning discrimination inside prisons #SupremeCourt
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar against a single judge order refusing to reject a defamation suit filed by cricketer MS Dhoni against the IPS officer and others.
- The Supreme Court on Friday (October 31) delivered a key ruling under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, clarifying that while mere delay in pronouncing an arbitral award does not invalidate it, an inordinate and unexplained delay making the decision ineffective or unworkable can render the award void.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
More
Recent Posts
- The Supreme Court today(October 31) allowed an intervention filed by the Criminal Justice and Police Accountability Project, arguing that the State of Madhya Pradesh has violated the 2024 Sukanya Shantha judgment through its Madhya Pradesh Sudharatmak Sevayen Evam Bandigrah Adhiniyam, 2024, in the suo moto matter concerning discrimination inside prisons #SupremeCourt
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- While hearing an anticipatory bail matter, the Court today orally remarked that the notice should not be served through social media platforms such as WhatsApp or Twitter.
- The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by retired IPS officer G Sampath Kumar against a single judge order refusing to reject a defamation suit filed by cricketer MS Dhoni against the IPS officer and others.
- The Supreme Court on Friday (October 31) delivered a key ruling under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, clarifying that while mere delay in pronouncing an arbitral award does not invalidate it, an inordinate and unexplained delay making the decision ineffective or unworkable can render the award void.