[26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: “comprising Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, while dismissing a criminal appeal filed against the conviction of an accused for offences punishable under Sections 449, 380 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, observed: “The defence further attempted to suggest that the murder might have been committed by some other person owing to an alleged partition dispute within the family” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/chandrasekar-v-the-state-2026mhc2291-alternative-theory-reasonable-doubt-1616666#:~:text=comprising%20Justice%20N,within%20the%20family [26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: .
[26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: “comprising Justice N. Anand Venkatesh and Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan, while dismissing a criminal appeal filed against the conviction of an accused for offences punishable under Sections 449, 380 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, observed: “The defence further attempted to suggest that the murder might have been committed by some other person owing to an alleged partition dispute within the family”
https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/chandrasekar-v-the-state-2026mhc2291-alternative-theory-reasonable-doubt-1616666#:~:text=comprising%20Justice%20N,within%20the%20family
[26/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: .
