SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: February 17, 2026

Uncategorized

Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan held that the tenants had no right to occupy or damage ancient structures in the temple based on illegal permission granted by the Joint Commissioner.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD)No.26210 of 2025 Nagarajan … Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District,...

The Madras High Court has reiterated that promotion is not a fundamental right, but consideration for promotion is a fundamental right. Justice S.M. Subramaniam made this observation while dismissing a petition seeking promotion to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS).

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court has reiterated that promotion is not a fundamental right, but consideration for promotion is a fundamental right. Justice S.M. Subramaniam made this observation while dismissing a petition seeking promotion to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS).

[17/02, 18:55] sekarreporter1: [17/02, 18:55] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-consideration-for-promotion-fundamental-right-523459 [17/02, 18:55] sekarreporter1: English [17/02, 18:55] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has reiterated that promotion is not a fundamental right, but consideration for promotion is a...

Uncategorized

12.In view of the above detailed discussion, we are of the firm view that the order of the learned Single Judge is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned writ order dated 14.03.2022 made in W.P.No.11568 of 2011.  No costs.

2026:MHC:565 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 06-02-2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA No. 2616 of 2022 AND CMP No. 20757...

Uncategorized

prosecution has established the major charges and had proved its case beyond all reasonable doubts against all accused. 33. In view of the judgment of reversal pronounced today convicting the respondents 2 to 24/A1 to A23 for the charged offences, the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 20.01.2026 Delivered on : 10.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Crl.A.No. 427 of 2019 Amutha W/o.Baskar …… Appellant...

நீதிபதி அனிதா சுமந்த், வழக்கை விசாரித்து, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார். வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தவரின் வாதங்களை நிராகரித்த நீதிபதி, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் சட்டப்படி செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்.

Uncategorized

நீதிபதி அனிதா சுமந்த், வழக்கை விசாரித்து, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார். வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தவரின் வாதங்களை நிராகரித்த நீதிபதி, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் சட்டப்படி செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்.

[17/02, 17:33] sekarreporter1: “filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of quo warranto, directing the respondents to call the records to quash and set aside the impugned...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com