![[24/10, 10:05] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1981580148181991527?t=HLVsO96bk-DdjUfCDa8hPg&s=08 [24/10, 10:05] Sekarreporter: திருவண்ணாமலை கோயில் மற்றும் மலை பகுதியில் உள்ள ஆக்கிரமிப்புகளை அகற்ற மீண்டும் நோட்டீசு வழங்க ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவிட்டது](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
- Vinothpandian: 2006 (4) SCC 538 : union of india vs Munshi Ram ; mistake on orders of court , cannot be allowed to retain the same benefit when the benefit given to Said others was reduced by order of court
- [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx_oMflZJPFrOovujF03ZR6jbEnzOM5MId?si=z0ymYd4X_Px8P0XB [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: *How an actress won ₹10 lakh from Sun TV for Veerappan’s remarks: 30-year case ends in Madras HC* During the interview, Veerappan had made certain claims about Sukanya’s alleged relationship with former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao’s son. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/how-an-actress-won-10-lakh-from-sun-tv-for-veerappans-remarks-30-year-case-ends-in-madras-hc
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
- Vinothpandian: 2006 (4) SCC 538 : union of india vs Munshi Ram ; mistake on orders of court , cannot be allowed to retain the same benefit when the benefit given to Said others was reduced by order of court
- [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx_oMflZJPFrOovujF03ZR6jbEnzOM5MId?si=z0ymYd4X_Px8P0XB [08/06, 14:01] sekarreporter1: *How an actress won ₹10 lakh from Sun TV for Veerappan’s remarks: 30-year case ends in Madras HC* During the interview, Veerappan had made certain claims about Sukanya’s alleged relationship with former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao’s son. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/how-an-actress-won-10-lakh-from-sun-tv-for-veerappans-remarks-30-year-case-ends-in-madras-hc