Daily Archive: February 14, 2022

Acting Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice PD Audikesavalu followed the previous judgments by Allahabad and Delhi High Courts and held that the procedure contemplated under the amended provisions from Sections 147-151 of the Act ought to have been followed for the issue of reassessment notices.

Acting Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice PD Audikesavalu followed the previous judgments by Allahabad and Delhi High Courts and held that the procedure contemplated under the amended provisions from Sections 147-151 of the Act ought to have been followed for the issue of reassessment notices.

The Madras High Court has recently set aside a number of reassessment notices issued under the 1961 Income Tax Act by iterating that the Taxation Relaxation Act, 2020 only extends the period of limitation...

bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh rejected an argument raised in a case that the minority view in Union of India vs. V. Sriharan – (2016) 7 SCC 1 should be looked into as two of the Judges opined one way in the Constitution Bench.

bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh rejected an argument raised in a case that the minority view in Union of India vs. V. Sriharan – (2016) 7 SCC 1 should be looked into as two of the Judges opined one way in the Constitution Bench.

The Supreme Court observed that life imprisonment without any remission till the last breath can be imposed as a substitution of death sentence. The bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh rejected...

Send ur legal question advocates are  ready to answer சட்டம் தொடர்பான உங்கள் கேள்விகளை அனுப்புங்கள் பதில. அளிக்க வக்கீல்கள் தயார்

Send ur legal question advocates are ready to answer சட்டம் தொடர்பான உங்கள் கேள்விகளை அனுப்புங்கள் பதில. அளிக்க வக்கீல்கள் தயார்

Send ur legal question advocates are ready to answer சட்டம் தொடர்பான உங்கள் கேள்விகளை அனுப்புங்கள் பதில. அளிக்க வக்கீல்கள் தயார் Add . sekarreporter1@gmail.com Whatsapp no 9445430817 Send ur legal question advocates are ready to answer சட்டம்...

TN Tenant New Act Land mark Judgement of Justice R Subramaniyam Mhc adv PB Balaji super interview

TN Tenant New Act Land mark Judgement of Justice R Subramaniyam Mhc adv PB Balaji super interview

[2/13, 07:32] Sekarreporter 1: Madras high court feb 12th orders ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவுகள் பிப் 12 https://www.sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-feb-12th-orders-%e0%ae%90%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8b%e0%ae%b0%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%89%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%b5%e0%af%81%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b3%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%aa/ [2/13, 08:17] Sekarreporter 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna and...

Justice R Subramaniyam. -order if agreement – oral or written expired before new Act came into force then eviction can be filed under new act only on one ground i.e failure to enter into written tenancy agreement as required by new act. ie Section 21(2)(a)

Justice R Subramaniyam. -order if agreement – oral or written expired before new Act came into force then eviction can be filed under new act only on one ground i.e failure to enter into written tenancy agreement as required by new act. ie Section 21(2)(a)

Justice R Subramaniyam rent court dismissed eviction petitions on ground that agreements were not registered with the Rent Authority as required under the new rent act. six CRPs were filed – facts differed in...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com