Daily Archive: February 9, 2022

draw a scheme for regularisation or re-location of the Hindu Temples or any religious structures in the State which have been built on Poramboke lands either objectionable or un objectionable for removal of encroachments either under the National Disaster Management Act, 2005 or under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 or under any other law and issue such further or   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)     W.P. No.             OF 2022     Elango  S/o Thirunavukkarasu

draw a scheme for regularisation or re-location of the Hindu Temples or any religious structures in the State which have been built on Poramboke lands either objectionable or un objectionable for removal of encroachments either under the National Disaster Management Act, 2005 or under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 or under any other law and issue such further or IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) W.P. No.             OF 2022 Elango S/o Thirunavukkarasu

MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)   W.P. No.             OF 2022   Elango S/o Thirunavukkarasu Hindu,...

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA and  THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY  W.A.No.856 of 2021  Dr.Elizabeth Rajan.      PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.  The interesting question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether a Power of Attorney executed outside India is in compliance  with Section 14 of the Indian Notaries Act, 1952 and its authentication.  –

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.No.856 of 2021 Dr.Elizabeth Rajan. PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. The interesting question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether a Power of Attorney executed outside India is in compliance with Section 14 of the Indian Notaries Act, 1952 and its authentication. –

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON 23.09.2021 PRONONOUNCED ON  02.02.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.No.856 of 2021 Dr.Elizabeth Rajan Daughter of...

Judges retirement age

Judges retirement age

  Judges retirement age   ஥ாண்புமிகு அவ஬த்஡வன஬ர் அ஬ர்களப, உ஦ர் நீதி஥ன்ந நீதிததிகளின் ஓய்வு பதறும் ஬஦வ஡ 62 லிருந்து, 65 ஆகவும், உச்ச நீதி஥ன்ந நீதிததிகளின் ஓய்வு பதறும் ஬஦வ஡ 65 லிருந்து 70 ஆகவும் உ஦ர்த்து஬து ப஡ாடர்தாண முக்கி஦ வி஬கா஧த்வ஡ இந்஡ அவ஬யின்...

Police promotin case full bench order  THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.PARESH UPADHYAY  THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH     AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.KRISHNAN RAMASAMY     W.A.Nos.3748 of 2019, 1813, 1814,1815 of 2015, 1193 of 2016, 1246, 1247 of 2016, WA No.103,

Police promotin case full bench order THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.PARESH UPADHYAY THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.A.Nos.3748 of 2019, 1813, 1814,1815 of 2015, 1193 of 2016, 1246, 1247 of 2016, WA No.103,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ORDERS  RESERVED ON:  28.01.2022     PRONOUNCING ORDERS ON:  04.02.2022          CORAM THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.PARESH UPADHYAY THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.N.ANAND VENKATESH   AND THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR.KRISHNAN...

Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence made in Crl.A.No.6 of 2011, dated 22.04.2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Fast Tract Court, Nagapattinam  case full order of     THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY     Crl.R.C.No.719 of 2014   

Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence made in Crl.A.No.6 of 2011, dated 22.04.2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Fast Tract Court, Nagapattinam case full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.719 of 2014  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Order Reserved on :  24.01.2022   Order Pronounced on : 08.02.2022   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   Crl.R.C.No.719 of 2014  ...

[2/9, 13:01] Sekarreporter 1: TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram tells Madras HC that State Govt cannot constitute a press council (as directed by a Division Bench of the court last year) and that only the Centre can do it. He also says accreditation alone can be regulated by State Government [2/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter 1: Case adjourned by a week at the request of AG.

[2/9, 13:01] Sekarreporter 1: TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram tells Madras HC that State Govt cannot constitute a press council (as directed by a Division Bench of the court last year) and that only the Centre can do it. He also says accreditation alone can be regulated by State Government [2/9, 13:02] Sekarreporter 1: Case adjourned by a week at the request of AG.

[2/9, 13:01] Sekarreporter 1: TN Advocate General R Shunmugasundaram tells Madras HC that State Govt cannot constitute a press council (as directed by a Division Bench of the court last year) and that only...

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY     Crl.R.C.Nos.468 and 446 of 2014     K.Ravi                                                                                 .. Petitioner                                                      (in Crl.R.C.No.468 of 2014)

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.Nos.468 and 446 of 2014   K.Ravi                                                                                 .. Petitioner                                                     (in Crl.R.C.No.468 of 2014)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Order Reserved on :  31.01.2022   Order Pronounced on : 08.02.2022   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   Crl.R.C.Nos.468 and 446 of...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com