Daily Archive: March 30, 2021

March 30, 2021

Full.order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22171 & 22173 of 2018. —The Fair and Decreetal order passed in C.M.A.No.61 of 2008 dated 08.01.2018, reversing the order of the Forest Settlement Officer, Attur, passed in F.S.C.No.839 of 2002 dated 27.06.2002 stands confirmed and consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal in C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2018 is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.03.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22171 & 22173 of 2018 1.M/s.Prabha Enterprises Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Vivekanandan (Died)...

Twin Judges in Conservative v. Liberal Terrain – Does Law Have All The Answers? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan Justices V Parthiban & N Anand Venkatesh Textualist v. Evolutionist. Conservative v. Liberal. Stephen Bryer v. Antonin Scalia. G. S. Singhvi v. D Y Chandrachud. You can go on and on. The feelings and faculties that are triggered from this debate could be multiple. There could be appreciation, understanding, outrage and/or even revulsion, convulsion from the construct, put upon constitutional law, by either side.

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

Twin Judges in Conservative v. Liberal Terrain – Does Law Have All The Answers? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan Justices V Parthiban & N Anand Venkatesh Textualist v. Evolutionist. Conservative v. Liberal. Stephen Bryer v. Antonin Scalia. G. S. Singhvi v. D Y Chandrachud. You can go on and on. The feelings and faculties that are triggered from this debate could be multiple. There could be appreciation, understanding, outrage and/or even revulsion, convulsion from the construct, put upon constitutional law, by either side.

Twin Judges in Conservative v. Liberal Terrain – Does Law Have All The Answers? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan Justices V Parthiban & N Anand Venkatesh Textualist v. Evolutionist. Conservative v. Liberal. Stephen Bryer v. Antonin Scalia....

[3/30, 15:05] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/9NJBYum92Jo [3/30, 15:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/03/30/watch-%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%80%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%b5%e0%af%86%e0%ae%99%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%87%e0%ae%b7%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%87/

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

[3/30, 15:05] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/9NJBYum92Jo [3/30, 15:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/03/30/watch-%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%80%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%b5%e0%af%86%e0%ae%99%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%87%e0%ae%b7%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%87/

[3/30, 15:05] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/9NJBYum92Jo [3/30, 15:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/03/30/watch-%e0%ae%b5%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%af%80%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%b5%e0%af%86%e0%ae%99%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%87%e0%ae%b7%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%ae%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%87/

MadrasHC orders counselling to parents who opposed relationship of a same sex couple. Says such measures are important since court is moving into uncharted waters. HC passed the order on a plea moved by two girls who were harassed by police over their relationship

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

MadrasHC orders counselling to parents who opposed relationship of a same sex couple. Says such measures are important since court is moving into uncharted waters. HC passed the order on a plea moved by two girls who were harassed by police over their relationship

[3/30, 13:46] Sekarreporter1: #MadrasHC orders counselling to parents who opposed relationship of a same sex couple. Says such measures are important since court is moving into uncharted waters. HC passed the order on a...

Sekarreporter1: [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376791178549415942?s=08 [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: Today the Hon’ble CJ and Hon’ble Mr Justice senthil Kumar Ramamoothy after hearing of Arguments of Mr P. Wilson appearing for DMK has passed following orders:- 1) As per directions of this court dated 24.3.2021 meeting was convened with all political parties and clear instructions were given to take the

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

Sekarreporter1: [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376791178549415942?s=08 [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: Today the Hon’ble CJ and Hon’ble Mr Justice senthil Kumar Ramamoothy after hearing of Arguments of Mr P. Wilson appearing for DMK has passed following orders:- 1) As per directions of this court dated 24.3.2021 meeting was convened with all political parties and clear instructions were given to take the

[3/30, 12:40] Sekarreporter1: [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376791178549415942?s=08 [3/30, 12:38] Sekarreporter1: Today the Hon’ble CJ and Hon’ble Mr Justice senthil Kumar Ramamoothy after hearing of Arguments of Mr P. Wilson appearing for DMK has passed...

Tenant case s vaithiyanathan judge full orderRegistry is directed to send a copy of this order to MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the respective Associations that they should not defend a dishonest Tenant, who happens to be a deceitful Advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, in order to safeguard the reputation of this profession. An Advocate, who happens to be a tenant, should be a gentleman and shall vacate the premises within 30 days, if request is made by the landlord. If that happens, a Lawyer will get a house on rent even without a written agreement. Some of the Advocates are now-a-days looked at as Rowdies and third rate criminals by public by the conduct of similar to the one of the tenant in this case. It is painful to say that many of the Advocates are involved in the land grabbing and if the antecedent of the petitioner / S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., jrs/ar tenant is verified, he may also be one of the land grabbers. The tenant has scant regard for the orders of the Court and he has portrayed sadistic attitude. With the above observations and directions, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands closed. 03.02.2021

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

Tenant case s vaithiyanathan judge full orderRegistry is directed to send a copy of this order to MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the respective Associations that they should not defend a dishonest Tenant, who happens to be a deceitful Advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, in order to safeguard the reputation of this profession. An Advocate, who happens to be a tenant, should be a gentleman and shall vacate the premises within 30 days, if request is made by the landlord. If that happens, a Lawyer will get a house on rent even without a written agreement. Some of the Advocates are now-a-days looked at as Rowdies and third rate criminals by public by the conduct of similar to the one of the tenant in this case. It is painful to say that many of the Advocates are involved in the land grabbing and if the antecedent of the petitioner / S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., jrs/ar tenant is verified, he may also be one of the land grabbers. The tenant has scant regard for the orders of the Court and he has portrayed sadistic attitude. With the above observations and directions, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands closed. 03.02.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2021 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.M.P.No.6514 of 2020 in Tr.C.M.P.No.942 of 2019 V.K.Kumaresan … Petitioner/Tenant -vs- 1. P.Jayaseelan … Respondent/Landlord 2. Bar Council of...

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)

Uncategorized

March 30, 2021

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)

[3/29, 12:11] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect...

Daily Archive: March 30, 2021

MadrasHC orders counselling to parents who opposed relationship of a same sex couple. Says such measures are important since court is moving into uncharted waters. HC passed the order on a plea moved by two girls who were harassed by police over their relationship

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Patricia Mukhim vs state of meghalaya @ SLP no ( cri ) 103 of 2021 dated 25 – 03 – 2021 : Unless speech has tendency to affect public order, free speech of a person cannot be stifled by implicating in criminal case ( freedom of speech)

Recent Posts

Recent Posts