SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: February 22, 2021

Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the order, after also taking note that “there is an efficacious alternative remedy for the petitioner and the governing law recognises the same.” “Far too often Courts are burdened with dishonest litigants trying to dodge the debts due to banks and financial institutions by pleading to the non-existent mercy jurisdiction of the Writ Court. It is high time that such frivolous litigations are brought to an end and the dishonest debtors appropriately rewarded,” the order said.

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy passed the order, after also taking note that “there is an efficacious alternative remedy for the petitioner and the governing law recognises the same.” “Far too often Courts are burdened with dishonest litigants trying to dodge the debts due to banks and financial institutions by pleading to the non-existent mercy jurisdiction of the Writ Court. It is high time that such frivolous litigations are brought to an end and the dishonest debtors appropriately rewarded,” the order said.

News Columns Dealstreet Interviews Apprentice Lawyer Viewpoint हिंदी ಕನ್ನಡ Litigation News Courts burdened with dishonest litigants dodging debts by resorting to non-existent, mercy jurisdiction of writ courts: Madras High Court “It is high time...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy did not mince any words when it came to the arbitral award itself, observing, “While it is not necessary for an arbitral award to justify every paisa or a rupee awarded to the claimant, the broad premise on which the quantum is founded has to be discernible from award itself for the award to be meaningful or even intelligible in legal terms. In short, the award impugned before the Arbitration Court in this case was the classical example of what an arbitral award could never be.” The Court noted that the last few pages of the arbitral award, which records its operative portion, only mentions by 6-7 lines of “an excuse for reasons” while dealing one of three claim-heads.

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy did not mince any words when it came to the arbitral award itself, observing, “While it is not necessary for an arbitral award to justify every paisa or a rupee awarded to the claimant, the broad premise on which the quantum is founded has to be discernible from award itself for the award to be meaningful or even intelligible in legal terms. In short, the award impugned before the Arbitration Court in this case was the classical example of what an arbitral award could never be.” The Court noted that the last few pages of the arbitral award, which records its operative portion, only mentions by 6-7 lines of “an excuse for reasons” while dealing one of three claim-heads.

News Columns Dealstreet Interviews Apprentice Lawyer Viewpoint हिंदी ಕನ್ನಡ Litigation News Not worth paper it is printed on: Madras High Court slams Arbitration Court for confirming unreasoned arbitral award “… the award impugned before...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Company Limited (TANGEDCO) recent global tender calling for import of coal is now under challenge by way of PIL on the ground that the Report No. 5 of 2017 of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Public

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distribution Company Limited (TANGEDCO) recent global tender calling for import of coal is now under challenge by way of PIL on the ground that the Report No. 5...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Madras High Court recently held that the award of maintenance in matrimonial disputes should ordinarily be from the date of the application by the woman-claimant and not from the date of the order awarding maintenance (Mohamed Nisha Banu v. Mohamed Rafi and ors). An award from the date of the order can be made only if there are sufficient supporting reasons for the same, Justice K Murali Shankar ruled

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

The Madras High Court recently held that the award of maintenance in matrimonial disputes should ordinarily be from the date of the application by the woman-claimant and not from the date of the order awarding maintenance (Mohamed Nisha Banu v. Mohamed Rafi and ors). An award from the date of the order can be made only if there are sufficient supporting reasons for the same, Justice K Murali Shankar ruled

News Right to claim maintenance must date back to date of filing of application, not date of court order: Madras High Court “The right to claim maintenance must date back to the date of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1363801615950471168?s=08 [2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: Today 22.02.2021 – R S Bharathi’s SC ST Act case came up before Hon’ble Justice N.Sathish Kumar – Quash petition filed by R.S.Bharathi

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1363801615950471168?s=08 [2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: Today 22.02.2021 – R S Bharathi’s SC ST Act case came up before Hon’ble Justice N.Sathish Kumar – Quash petition filed by R.S.Bharathi

[2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1363801615950471168?s=08 [2/22, 16:14] Sekarreporter1: Today 22.02.2021 – R S Bharathi’s SC ST Act case came up before Hon’ble Justice N.Sathish Kumar – Quash petition filed by R.S.Bharathi State Public Prosecutor Mr.A.Natarajan...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

Justice M Dhandapani said that petitioner L Nagaraj worked as assistant executive engineer in the department for more than 33 years and retired without any blemish. Hence, the charge memo issued against him after his retirement is unsustainable. He was working in Tangedco at Pugalur in Trichy district and retired from service on June 30, 2014. After the petitioner’s retirement, there was a family dispute between the petitioner and his second son-in-law Vijaya Kumar.

Samsung Galaxy F62 | Speedy becomes a #FullOnSpeedy player WATCH TOIOPEN APP CITY Can’t issue memo against retired govt employee: HC TNN | Feb 22, 2021, 04:11 IST +1 AA Madurai: Disciplinary proceedings against...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 22, 2021

Justice MS Ramesh passed the interim order following a petition filed by a candidate, S Pandiammal, participating in the Teachers Recruitment Board’s (TRB) Assistant Professor recruitment

ADVERTISEMENT  SUBSCRIBE E-PAPER STOCK MARKET BSE NSE Home  States  Tamil Nadu Court orders interim stay against regularisation of guest lecturers The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court on Friday ordered an interim stay against the steps...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version