SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: February 9, 2021

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian mhc advt law tips supreme 65 : manoharan vs state by inspector of police , variety hall police station coimbatore : Review can only be on a glaring error apparent on the face of the judgement or order , a mere change or addition of grounds cannot be allowed at the stage of review ( art 137 constitution of india )

[2/8, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2019 (4) crimes SC 365 : Rajesh tiwari vs Alok pandey : Advocate maligning and scandalizing the court held guilty of criminal contempt of court by high court , sentencing him...

Watch “நீதிகேட்டு 11 ஆண்டுகள் போராட்டம் வக்கீல் சங்கரசுப்பு உருக்கம் மகன் வழக்கு — mhc full bench order” on YouTube senior advt.prabakaraக்கு வக.கீல் சங்கரசுப்பு தன்றி

Uncategorized

Watch “நீதிகேட்டு 11 ஆண்டுகள் போராட்டம் வக்கீல் சங்கரசுப்பு உருக்கம் மகன் வழக்கு — mhc full bench order” on YouTube senior advt.prabakaraக்கு வக.கீல் சங்கரசுப்பு தன்றி

[2/9, 09:56] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2021/02/09/watch-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%95%e0%af%87%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%81-11-%e0%ae%86%e0%ae%a3%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%81%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%b3%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8b/ [2/9, 09:57] Sekarreporter1: Watch “நீதிகேட்டு 11 ஆண்டுகள் போராட்டம் வக்கீல் சங்கரசுப்பு உருக்கம் மகன் வழக்கு — mhc full bench order” on YouTube senior advt.prabakaraக்கு தன்றி     https://youtu.be/vko7CAa9u74    

[2/9, 08:20] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: , today law notes [2/9, 08:30] Sekarreporter1: [2/9, 08:19] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 09.02.2021: K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv – The Principles of Judicial Review would apply to the exercise of contractual powers by the Government or its instrumentalities, in order to prevent arbitrariness or favouritism. It’s decision to grant contracts/licenses to private bodies can be questioned in any one of the following grounds: (1) Bad faith; (2) Based on irrational or irrelevant consideration; (3) non compliance with prescribed procedure; (4) violation of any constitutional or statutory provisions; (5) collateral purposes; (6) ulterior motive; (7) Favouritism, Malice or Malafide Delhi Scientific Forum Vs. Union of India [AIR 1996 SC 1356] Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC 651] Union of India Vs. Dinesh Engineering Corporation [(2001) 8 SCC 491] [2/9, 08:30] Sekarreporter1: ☘️☘️

Uncategorized

[2/9, 08:20] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: , today law notes [2/9, 08:30] Sekarreporter1: [2/9, 08:19] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 09.02.2021: K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv – The Principles of Judicial Review would apply to the exercise of contractual powers by the Government or its instrumentalities, in order to prevent arbitrariness or favouritism. It’s decision to grant contracts/licenses to private bodies can be questioned in any one of the following grounds: (1) Bad faith; (2) Based on irrational or irrelevant consideration; (3) non compliance with prescribed procedure; (4) violation of any constitutional or statutory provisions; (5) collateral purposes; (6) ulterior motive; (7) Favouritism, Malice or Malafide Delhi Scientific Forum Vs. Union of India [AIR 1996 SC 1356] Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC 651] Union of India Vs. Dinesh Engineering Corporation [(2001) 8 SCC 491] [2/9, 08:30] Sekarreporter1: ☘️☘️

[2/9, 08:20] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: , today law notes [2/9, 08:30] Sekarreporter1: [2/9, 08:19] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 09.02.2021: K. Selvaraj, MHC Adv – The Principles of Judicial Review would apply to the...

Uncategorized

Justice MS Ramesh, who heard the plea, said that the court would not interfere in the matter. “The ECI is conferred with the powers to pass such guidelines. If any order is passed in this issue, it could have a huge impact on the election process,” he pointed out.

ADVERTISEMENT  SUBSCRIBE E-PAPER STOCK MARKET BSE NSE Home  States  Tamil Nadu Plea to modify Election Commission’s transfer guidelines for polls binned However, Justice MS Ramesh, who heard the plea, said that the court would not interfere...

Uncategorized

The Madras high court on Monday came down heavily on advocates indulging in illegal activities such as land-grabbing and spoiling the image of the profession while hearing a writ petition against a group of people that included lawyers who allegedly tried to take over a property by force. ADVERTISEMENT SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT “When it comes to the conduct of the advocates, there will be zero tolerance shown by this Court and this Court has to ensure that the activities of some of the advocates do not spoil the image of the entire profession,” justice Anand Venketash said.

Latest Most Read My Reads Saved Home / India News / Zero tolerance for lawyers who spoil image of profession: Madras High Court Madras High Court.(HT file) INDIA NEWS Zero tolerance for lawyers who spoil image of...

8-1-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate: FREEDOM in the preamble: The freedom is inseparable with democratic form of government. it includes freedom of think, thought, speech, expression,belief,faith and worship etc., it includes many invisible rights

Uncategorized

8-1-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate: FREEDOM in the preamble: The freedom is inseparable with democratic form of government. it includes freedom of think, thought, speech, expression,belief,faith and worship etc., it includes many invisible rights

8-1-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate: FREEDOM in the preamble: The freedom is inseparable with democratic form of government. it includes freedom of think, thought, speech, expression,belief,faith and worship etc., it includes many invisible rights...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com