Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: January 24, 2020

January 24, 2020

[1/24, 18:53] sekarreporter1: [1/24, 18:24] Bar Council vice chairman Karthigayan: The Bar Council Chairman Mr.P.S.AMALRAJ,Vice Chairman Mr.V.Karthikeyan ,BCI Mr.S.Prabakaran ,Senior Advocate,and Mr.G.Mhoganakrishnan all are special Welcome to Mr.P.Wilson,Senior Advocate,and Mr.ARL SUNDARESAN,Senior Advocate, Also Today 24/01/2020 Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996 Books issued For District Judge Exams(Preliminary)all Students. @ Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry. [1/24, 18:33] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [1/24, 19:36] sekarreporter1: On behalf of our TN Senior Advocates forum, I thank Mr ARL Sundaresan Senior Advocate who delivered lecture today (24.1.2020) between 4.30-6.30pm at Barcouncil Auditorium , Chennai on The Arbitrationand concillation Act Many thanks to him💐 P. Wilson Senior Advocate Convenor NEETHI KARANGAL

Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

January 24, 2020

Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

Rajini case Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

January 24, 2020

Rajini case Durai Arun: Publish news in a broader way , not in the narrow way [1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

[1/24, 19:14] sekarreporter1: [1/24, 16:33] sekarreporter1: 👍👍 [1/24, 16:50] Durai Arun: In the case filed by the Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam to take action against Actor Rajinikanth, the state Public Prosecutor senior counsel A.Natarajan appeared...

January 24, 2020

For state of Tamil Nadu State Government Pleader V.Jayaprakash Narayanan argued. Sankara subbu argued, at the time of arrest one accused shot dead and thereafter 3 more accused were shot dead by police. State GP argued that the review committee spent five different dates for hearing from various senior counsels including Sankara subbu on behalf of accused persons and taken a decision and after satisfaction of prima facie case made out under POTA Act permitted to continue the trial. Further the decision was taken after perusal of all materials collected by investigation officer found the case is fit for continuation of trial under POTA Act. GP further told the court that the terrorists only invited such situation which nececitates the police to take extreme step of firing on them. Heated arguments by both sides. Sankara subbu sought further time for continuation of arguments posted on 3/2/2020

January 24, 2020

After persual of affidivit filed by R.Y. George Williams hon’ble division bench consisting justice . Sathya Narayanan and Hema latha order notice to the R.G. , government , C.I.S.F commander.In this petition R.Y. George Williams mentioned that the learned advocates , litigants , law student , high court staff , medical staff , press reporter , law clerks are suffering a lot because , everyone are constrain to enter the high court premises atleast more than 10 to 15 times per day. And everytime they have to show identity card and has to raise hand for frisking and further C.I.S.F persons also suffer because of this procedure and since work.

January 24, 2020

Rajini case State Public Prosecutor Mr.A Natarajan argued that the petitioners should have followed procedures laid down by the Hon’ble division bench in Judgement “G.Prabakaran Vs Superintendent of Tanjore”

January 24, 2020

Rajiniganth case Justice P Rajamanickam wondered why the petitioner had hurried to the court without even waiting for at least 15 days from the date of filing the complaint. Moreover, the organisation must have approached the magistrate court first before moving the high court, the judge added.

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com