2013 (2) CPR 14 : mrs Rubi ( chandra ) dutta vs M/ S united india insurance co ltd : consumer protection act does not contain any provision for grant of interest , but interest can still be awarded taking recourse to section 34 of CPC to do complete justice between parties

[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) CPR 14 : mrs Rubi ( chandra ) dutta vs M/ S united india insurance co ltd : consumer protection act does not contain any provision for grant of interest , but interest can still be awarded taking recourse to section 34 of CPC to do complete justice between parties
[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 601 : Ravi Raman vs Arul viswanathan : order 16 rule 1 ( 111) CPC 1908 : witness whose name is not reflected in list of witnesses can still be summoned on showing sufficient cause for omission
[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 865 : state of madhya pradesh rep by additional director of agriculture , bhopal madhya pradesh vs intellectual property appellate board : order 8 CPC 1908 : non – consideration of averments made in written submissions will not make judicial order invalid
[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 812 : Dhananjezhiyan vs kuppu : Registration act 1908 sec 17 & 49 : unstamped and unregistered document is inadmissible in evidence , it cannot be relied upon in court proceedings when such document becomes basis of claim of person tracing his or her title
[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2012 (6) SCC 430 : A shanmugam vs Ariya kshatriya Rajakula : unless wrong doers are denied profit or undue benefit from frivolous litigations , it would be difficult to control frivolous and uncalled for litigations , experience also reveals that our courts have been very reluctant to grant the actual or realistic costs
[17/10, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) Acquittal 66 : Garbhu yadav and another vs state of bihar : court cannot and should not pick up 0ne single line of evidence and consider it to raise an inference in criminal trial proceedings