[2/26, 09:52] Sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-urges-state-to-take-library-movement-to-next-level [2/26, 09:53] Sekarreporter1: Lordship dhandabani j order

by Sekar Reporter · February 26, 2021

• [2/26, 09:52] Sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-urges-state-to-take-library-movement-to-next-level
  [2/26, 09:53] Sekarreporter1: Lordship dhandabani j order

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN TO BE HEARD THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / HYBRID MODE / PHYSICAL MODE ON FRIDAY THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY 2026 AT 10.30 A.M. COURT NO. 02 THE ADVOCATES/PARTY IN PERSON ARE REQUESTED 1. TO INSTALL MICROSOFT TEAMS VC APPLICATION IN THEIR DESKTOP/LAPTOP / I-PAD / MOBILE PHONE AND TO JOIN THE COURT VC SESSION CLICK HERE 2. TO MENTION THE ITEM NO AND NAME WHILE LOGIN TO THE COURT. 3. TO MAINTAIN PROPER DRESS CODE. 4. TO MUTE THEIR MIC WHILE OTHER COUNSEL IS IN ARGUMENT, TO PREVENT UNWANTED NOISE DISTURBANCE DURING THE VIDEO CONFERENCING AND UNMUTE THE MIC ONLY AT THE TIME OF THEIR ARGUMENT. 5. LAWYERS TO KEEP THEIR VIDEOS ON BUT MIC OFF. 6. COURT LINK ALSO AVAILABLE IN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/vclink TO DISPENSE WITH 1 To dispense with the production of the certified copy of the order dated 04.04.2024 made in WP No. 4933 of 2021 and thus render justice. To Dispense With CMP/13337/2025

  January 1, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 1, 2026

• 

  *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* K. Vasudevan vs State of Tamil Nadu – *Date of Order:* December 3, 2025 – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Mr. K. Selvaraj – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court has questioned the Tamil Nadu government on why bus stops are being constructed on national highways without permission. The court expressed concern that such unauthorized constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. The court has directed the state government to take action to prevent such constructions and file a response in the matter. *Key Points:* – The petitioner, a councilor, had filed a petition against the construction of a bus stop on a national highway in Ranipet district. – The court was informed that the construction was being carried out without permission and was likely misusing MLA funds. – The judges observed that such constructions can lead to traffic congestion and accidents. – The court has directed the state government to take action and file a response in the matter.

  December 4, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 4, 2025

• 

  THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   Writ Petition No.1835 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.1920 of 2026   S.Uzma Farheen                                                                               ..              Petitioner   Vs.   1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary Education Department

  January 30, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 30, 2026