![Dr.VRS Sampath,Editor Sattakadhir ,R Vidudhalai Former Advocate General &Member Bar Council P.S.Amulraj Chairman Bar council ofTN&Pondy ,D.Saravanan Member Bar Council A N PURUSHOTHAM SGP All are Advocates Madras High Court..Attending 12th World Tamils Economic Conference at Washington DC October 3 to 5 [02/10, 20:36] Sekarreporter: [02/10, 20:22] Dmk Purusothaman: Dr.VRS Sampath,Editor Sattakadhir ,R Vidudhalai Former Advocate General &Member Bar Council P.S.Amulraj Chairman Bar council ofTN&Pondy ,D.Saravanan Member Bar Council A N PURUSHOTHAM SGP All are Advocates Madras High Court..Attending 12th World Tamils Economic Conference at Washington DC October 3 to 5](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story : Letter ROC.NO.201/2020/AGVIV uattu 27 6. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.203/2026/AGVN dated 29.05.2026. 7. From the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Letter ROC.No.230/2026/AGVN dated 05.06.2026. ORDER: In the circumstances stated by the learned Advocate General of Tamil Nadu in the letter 7th read above, the Government hereby appoint the following advocates as temporary Law Officers in the rank of “Government Advocates (Criminal Side)” to represent the Government before the High Court of Madras under rule 5(11) of the Law Officers of High Court of Madras and its Bench at Madurai (Appointment), Rules, 2017:- High Court of Madras SI. No. Name of the Advocate Enrolment No. Post 1 Ms.R.S.Indira MS 171/2010 Thiru. M.Mohamed MS 1492/2002 Temporary Law Officers in the rank of 2 Riyaz 2 3 Thiru.M.M.I.Khaleel MS 200/2011 4 Government Thiru. Durai MS 1128/2004 Advocates (Criminal Side), High Court of Madras, Chennai. Gunasekaran 2. The Government further order that the advocates appointed in agraph 1 above shall be paid retainer fee and the appearance fee as per 2nd read above. (BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) K.MANIVASAN ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT Advocates concerned rough the Deputy Director, ffice of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. Advocate General of Tamil Nadu, Chennai-104. Registrar General, High Court, Chennai-104. Additional Registrar General, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, adurai- 625 023. Deputy Director, Ce of the Advocate General, Tamil Nadu, High Court, Chennai-104. ublic Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. State Government Pleader, High Court of Madras, Chennai-104. Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of High Court of Madras adurai 625 023. Comment Highlight Underline Strikethrough Draw 00 00 More tools
- Previous story New govt advts SI No Names of the Advocate, Tvlg Enrolment No. Office Attached to 1, Arun Anbumani MS 1355/2003 Madras High Court 2, Sharada Vivek MS 1078 2009 3. N.Palanivel MS 606 2001 4. I.Murugesan MS 608/2014 Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_
More
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_