[12/28, 07:51] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1210747430460805121?s=08 [12/28, 07:51] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:48] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:46] V subramani Advt: Thanks sekar..i won this case.. [12/28, 07:47] Sekarreporter 1: 👍 [12/28, 07:50] Sekarreporter 1: : No Copyright in Title of Film HC observation That the American Courts have taken a view that the title alone of a literary work cannot be protected under the Act. Copying of title alone, and not the plot, songs, dialogue etc. is not the subject of copyright law. https://sekarreporter.com/no-copyright-in-title-of-film-hc-observation-that-the-american-courts-have-taken-a-view-that-the-title-alone-of-a-literary-work-cannot-be-protected-under-the-act-copying-of-title-alone-and-not-the/
[12/28, 07:51] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:48] Sekarreporter 1: [12/28, 07:46] V subramani Advt: Thanks sekar..i won this case..
[12/28, 07:47] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[12/28, 07:50] Sekarreporter 1: : No Copyright in Title of Film HC observation That the American Courts have taken a view that the title alone of a literary work cannot be protected under the Act. Copying of title alone, and not the plot, songs, dialogue etc. is not the subject of copyright law. https://sekarreporter.com/no-copyright-in-title-of-film-hc-observation-that-the-american-courts-have-taken-a-view-that-the-title-alone-of-a-literary-work-cannot-be-protected-under-the-act-copying-of-title-alone-and-not-the/
