You may also like...
-
அதிரடி உத்தரவு JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE W.P. No.7920 of 2022 K.R.Jayagopi … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Hon’ble Tamil Nadu Lokayukta.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari Senior Advocate Assisted by Mr.S.T.Bharath Gowtham For Respondents : Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram Advocate General for R2 to R4, R6 Ms.S.Meenakshi for R1 Ms.M.Sneha for R5 To conclude, this petition is allowed, and this Court sets aside the order of the Lokayukta, dated 02.03.2022, and the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.01.2022 is remanded back to the Tamil Nadu Lokayukta, the first respondent, with a direction to revisit the same in the light of what have been hereinabove stated.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 7, 2023
-
Sekarreporter1: [12/23, 08:17] N. Girirajan Mhc Advt: https://www.indialegallive.com/constitutional-law-news/courts-news/madras-hc-hauls-up-advocate-for-using-forged-hc-order-initiates-suo-motu-contempt-proceedings/Girirajan Mhc Advt: This is a classic example of black sheep and how some Advocates stoop to lower their professional ethics and conduct
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 23, 2020
-