Follow:
- Next story [10/05, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxIFlt1pmBxLnDWIYZZYbhIb3TW1Nz_R6w?si=pg_673XLMzFC5a8t [10/05, 13:29] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: Advocate Tarun Rao appears for Election Commission of India. “What the petitioner seeks to do is to call in the question the election. This is permissible only by way of election petition.” [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: . [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: Rao: Assembly constituency numbers, name and district are always published for east of postal form. [10/05, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Rao is now showing how a postal ballot form looks.
- Previous story [10/05, 12:51] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxWv2xqdg-qmbY8SDzO8uxrZkFURMfCr_J?si=xru4j01w8uEaeip0 [10/05, 12:56] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: How does a mandamus lie in this case? The interim prayers are far beyond the scope of the main writ petition. Are we issuing mandamus in abstract? [10/05, 12:57] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: Once a gentleman has been declared elected he has a right to perform duties under law. No injunction can be granted to a case where a duty is enjoined to be performed. Once he is elected, he is duty bound to be heard. They are intruding the right of public who had not voted [10/05, 12:57] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: Is there an application filed by RO immediately on counting of votes? Court: Are there 2 constituencies by the same name? Raghavachari: Maybe. Court: You cannot say maybe. This is not a second. I am putting a straight question.
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS