You may also like...
-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN C.R.P. No.676 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 V.K.John …. Petitioner Vs 1. S.Mukanchand Bothra & HUF (died) Represented by Mukanchand Bothra the petitioner challenged the Arbitration Award under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, it is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. 12. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connect miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 03.02.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 10, 2023
-
-
Writ petition is misconceived and, accordingly, dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.1,00,000/- [Rupees One Lakh only] payable to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority within one month. Consequently, interim application stands closed. We have not expressed any opinion on merits and leave it to be considered in appropriately constituted petition. Further, this order shall not come in the way of the Election Commission in taking its own decision on issues sought to be raised in the petition. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 9, 2025 · Last modified September 10, 2025