05:33] Vinothpandian: 2003 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 354 SC : Narendra nath khaware vs parasnath khaware : judgement of acquittal rendered by high court , state not filing any

[1/11, 05:33] Vinothpandian: 2003 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 354 SC : Narendra nath khaware vs parasnath khaware : judgement of acquittal rendered by high court , state not filing any special leave petition or appeal , an appeal by special leave at the instance of complainant is maintainable
[1/11, 05:33] Vinothpandian: 1998 (1) RCR ( criminal ) 202 SC : sri jinnat mia @ jina mia vs state of Assam : Practice of court is not to interfere with question of fact except in exceptional cases when the finding is such that it shocks the conscience of court
[1/11, 05:33] Vinothpandian: 2002 (2) RCR ( criminal ) 58 SC : sukhbir singh vs state of haryana : In an appeal before supreme court in a murder case , if two views of an occurence are possible the view taken by one of the courts which is favourable to accused should be given credence
[1/11, 09:25] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 19 : pannerselvam vs sivagami ( DB ) : supreme court may grant decree of divorce on finding irretrievable breakdown of marriage in exercise of powers under article 142 to do complete justice
[1/11, 09:25] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 90 : inigo irudayaraj vs paul robin : Held balancing right to privacy and right to freedom of speech must be on touchstone of public interest ( art 19(1)(a) of constitution of india )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME